Dover science teachers refuse to read ID disclaimer

Perhaps in all our eliminating, we can eliminate the first lifeform that is said to have unitelligently appeared on earth from non life? If a theory can rest on this foundation, then it can rest on anything.
Creation simply looks at all lifeforms as here for a starting point, rather than the one. If creation is considered in the universe, as opposed to the Big Bang, which was a universe already, and set to expand, and eliminates the expansion over time part. Both start with a universe already conveintiently there, one, fairly full sized, the other, extemely tiny. One side assuming no design, the other finding the evidence different than that assumption, that is not supported by any evidence whatsoever. What evidence can you give how the singularity came to be from nowhere? The teachers are wrong if they put their belief in the unintelligent over the kids right to know, and should be gotten rid of. Obstructing justice and fairness, and truth, under the false banner of science is despicable.

Arranging my thoughts won't help someone much who cannot perceive intelligence in all creation around us.Waking up in the morning, looking at the sky, day or night, and all creation speaks of a design, and, of course intelligence. This is evidence.Now, for you to show us how the whole universe, although said to be tiny, and called a singularity, came to be? Show us the evidence?

"What do you deny?"I guess, it must be that discussing on this thread with you is a real possibility. Hope you don't kid yourself into thinking the dissapearing creation folks here dissapear because of some strength of arguement rather than one sided so called moderation!?