I find your lack of ability to stay on topic rather disappointing BarackZero.
The Cambrian Explosion, feathered lizards and Haeckel's embryology drawings have absolutely no relevance to your attempts to utilize "gaps in the fossil record" as a case against evolution.
Lets focus on these "gaps" first and THEN proceed to the other topics.
Let it be known that there has been no fossil yet discovered that is incompatiable with or otherwise debunks the Theory of Evolution. The fact that we haven't found an intermediate form to please you is absolutely meaningless for a few reasons.
1. We haven't uncovered literally all of the fossilized animal remains ever created in the history of geologic time.
2. As soon as a transitional form between two types of animals is discovered (like Najash) all it really does is create two more gaps to either side of it.
And 3. people like who you already have a pre-conceived notion of what is right and wrong will simply ignore the fact that an intermediate form was found an insist that more intermediates be found in the new gaps that were just formed.
Najash was a basal snake with diminutive limbs, showing an obvious link between lizards and snakes. Talk to the average creationist about it and the'll demand that more transitional forms between monitors and Najash, and Najash and true limbless snakes be found to satisfy the new gaps. I wouldn't put it past you to demand the same thing intentionally or otherwise.
Your lame attempts to simply change the subject are not new to me. Try something else next time.
Edited by Tupinambis, : No reason given.
Edited by Tupinambis, : No reason given.
™ Version 4.2
