Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Kansas State School Board At It Once Again
MisterOpus1
Inactive Member


Message 89 of 136 (206567)
05-09-2005 5:25 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by jar
03-02-2005 12:59 PM


Re: Well, they gave up on the idea of a trial.
Others have covered this story pretty well, but I would like to submit the reply to these questions jar posted from my local paper by Dr. Steve Case, co-chair of the science standards writing committee:
Welcome kcfs.org - BlueHost.com
I also posted a diary for any Daily Kos readers on this topic, primarily outlining the religious intent of those behind the ID movement to uproot evolution from our Kansas schools. Anyone attempting to state that this is NOT a religious movement is either horribly misinformed or blatantly lying. I tend to find in almost every case it seems to be the latter, and not the former:
What Are Us Kansas Natives Truly Up Against With This Evolution "Trial"?
Much of my sources I freely admit came from the KCFS website:
Welcome kcfs.org - BlueHost.com
And a very useful and informative blog from another local Lawrence resident, Josh Rosenau with updates on the "trial" can be found here:
Redirecting
HTH
Opus
Edit: One other thing to note - on our local Channel 6 News last night, there was a confession given by the 3 Conservative Board Members who are holding these "trials"/"hearings"/whateveryouwannacalltheseshananigans. When asked if any had read the Appproved Draft 2 on the Science Standards (written by the majority on the science panel), only 1 of the members admitted to fully reading Draft 2 (Steve Abrams). Of course it remains to be seen as to whether or not he actually understands it, but I digress. The other 2 members stated that they only "skimmed" the approved draft.
Strange how just merely skimming the approved draft written by actual scientists gives them so much of a supporting opinion to take the Minority Report that advocates ID instead......
This message has been edited by MisterOpus1, 05-09-2005 05:46 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by jar, posted 03-02-2005 12:59 PM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024