HELP!

quote:

---

Originally posted by John:

quote:

---

Originally posted by nos482:

​

Maybe, but for the fact that I'm not an atheist.

​

And you insult our intelligence with your creationism.

---

​

Right TC, nos is Wiccan ( my guess ) which is FAR better supported scientifically than creationism.

​

---

Please, get a life.

"They're your own words from your website."
--Whether they are or not, if someone in this forum was the webmaster of a porn site, doesn't mean that the content is appropriate here..."Please, get a life."
--Well, I'm done here.------------------[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 09-28-2002]

Well, I find that the original intent of this thread has gone way off. Actually I have no clue as to why all of you are even talking about boinking little girls. I find it rather amusing actually. I just stopped in to see if anybody else might have anything interesting to say and obviously you "scientific" wierdos have somehow managed to create a conversation revolving around things that don't even have to do with well, anything actually...Anyway, thank you everybody for your advice. And you Christian haters keep on discussing meaningless things.

quote:

---

Originally posted by TrueCreation:
"They're your own words from your website."
--Whether they are or not, if someone in this forum was the webmaster of a porn site, doesn't mean that the content is appropriate here...

​

"Please, get a life."
--Well, I'm done here.

​

---

You were done before you came here just by being a creationists. Maybe you can get your god to create a life for him?

quote:

---

Originally posted by xstremefaith:
Well, I find that the original intent of this thread has gone way off. Actually I have no clue as to why all of you are even talking about boinking little girls. I find it rather amusing actually. I just stopped in to see if anybody else might have anything interesting to say and obviously you "scientific" wierdos have somehow managed to create a conversation revolving around things that don't even have to do with well, anything actually...Anyway, thank you everybody for your advice. And you Christian haters keep on discussing meaningless things.

---

Nos's twisted little mind has taken my words out of context and won't let go of it. Basically, it boils down to this: I called nos on a particularly well un-supported claim on another thread. This tantrum is the result.Sorry.You tell someone that there is no evidence of an unbroken line of Wiccan tradition stretching back 23000 years and this is what you get. Who knew?------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

quote:

---

Originally posted by xstremefaith:
Well, I find that the original intent of this thread has gone way off. Actually I have no clue as to why all of you are even talking about boinking little girls. I find it rather amusing actually. I just stopped in to see if anybody else might have anything interesting to say and obviously you "scientific" wierdos have somehow managed to create a conversation revolving around things that don't even have to do with well, anything actually...Anyway, thank you everybody for your advice. And you Christian haters keep on discussing meaningless things.

---

No one is holding a gun to their heads."Oh, since they won't believe as we do then they must hate us!"Don't flatter yourself. I neither hate, nor love you.

you are so messed up...You take things so out of context... Why would i flatter myself about that????

quote:

---

Admins: This baseless character assassination is really starting to piss me off.

---

Alas, I don't have posting privledge suspension powers.
Admin (aka Percy) has been e-mailed (anyone can do that).Adminnemooseus[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 09-28-2002]

quote:

---

Originally posted by John:

quote:

---

Originally posted by xstremefaith:
Well, I find that the original intent of this thread has gone way off. Actually I have no clue as to why all of you are even talking about boinking little girls. I find it rather amusing actually. I just stopped in to see if anybody else might have anything interesting to say and obviously you "scientific" wierdos have somehow managed to create a conversation revolving around things that don't even have to do with well, anything actually...Anyway, thank you everybody for your advice. And you Christian haters keep on discussing meaningless things.

---

​

Nos's twisted little mind has taken my words out of context and won't let go of it. Basically, it boils down to this: I called nos on a particularly well un-supported claim on another thread. This tantrum is the result.

​

Sorry.

​

You tell someone that there is no evidence of an unbroken line of Wiccan tradition stretching back 23000 years and this is what you get. Who knew?

​

---

Man, you got it wrong, as usual. I never said any such thing. I had said that modern Wicca had very little to do with old Wicca, because the Church has done such a fine job of erraticating it over the centuries from the time it first invaded Europe and wanted to get rid of the competition.The article on your site is about getting rid of the age of consent. And there are very good reasons why there should be one.

quote:

---

Originally posted by xstremefaith:
you are so messed up...You take things so out of context... Why would i flatter myself about that????

---

You're the one who believes in fairy tales as facts.

What does that have to do with ANYTHING?????? I now see where this has gone to boinking little girls.

quote:

---

Originally posted by xstremefaith:
What does that have to do with ANYTHING?????? I now see where this has gone to boinking little girls.

---

I have taken you perfectly in context.

quote:

---

Originally posted by nos482:
Man, you got it wrong, as usual. I never said any such thing. I had said that modern Wicca had very little to do with old Wicca, because the Church has done such a fine job of erraticating it over the centuries from the time it first invaded Europe and wanted to get rid of the competition.

---

Anyone can read the thread nos. I'm not going to argue the point.

quote:

---

The article on your site is about getting rid of the age of consent. And there are very good reasons why there should be one.

---

BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!This is your knee-jerk reaction to the title. You've completely ignored the content of the article and the content of the messages I've sent to you concerning it.------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

To all:This forum has a strongly enforced set of guidelines for on-line behavior, but we also want a lively and energetic discussion. Weaving clever digs, both subtle and otherwise, into the pattern of a discussion is not discouraged here, but gratuitous insults that only divert attention from the primary subject are strongly discouraged. The first level of enforcement is warnings like this that name no names, but the second level is a 24-hour suspension of posting privileges.Because the originator of this thread has not returned since his first day, and because the tenor of the discussion declined into acrimonious exchanges, I fully endorse Adminnemooseus's closing of this thread.--------------------EvC Forum Administrator------------------
Note from Adminnemooseus: Actually, the thread originator had returned, most recently in message 86. Regardless, I still think the topic need be closed.[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 09-29-2002]

Hi Xstremefaith,I apologize that your thread ran so far off course. Sometimes these things aren't noticed soon enough. I hope you decide to continue participating in discussions.--EvC Forum Administrator