HELP!

"Like some others on here you think that all you need for "evidence" is to play some logic or word game and stop at that."
--Listen nos...your attitude grows ever so tedious. You have yet to even engaged in debate with me about anything scientific here, which you apparently avoid from your lack of potential flexibility to your evidently narrow minded personification."Well, this is only a small step in a long process. If you imderstood how science worked you would see this."
--I have briefly explained that you are the one displaying a misunderstanding of the fundamentals, but maybe I am wrong. When your acquisition is somewhat worth while we may come to this. Until then, your first impression shows that you are greatly lacking these principals.--So let us flee from this and get to something relevant to this forum.------------------[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 09-28-2002]

Originally posted by TrueCreation:--Listen nos...your attitude grows ever so tedious. You have yet to even engaged in debate with me about anything scientific here, which you apparently avoid from your lack of potential flexibility to your evidently narrow minded personification.First you have to know and understand how science works, and you being a creationists only know about pseudo-science thus I can't have a valid debate with you.--I have briefly explained that you are the one displaying a misunderstanding of the fundamentals, but maybe I am wrong. When your acquisition is somewhat worth while we may come to this. Until then, your first impression shows that you are greatly lacking these principals.What does money or the head of a school have to do with this? You mean principles. Gee, some people.--So let us flee from this and get to something relevant to this forum.There is no common grounds, I follow science and you believe in pseudo-science.[This message has been edited by nos482, 09-28-2002]

"First you have to know and understand how science works, and you being a creationists only know about pseudo-science thus I can't have a valid debate with you."
--Then you should leave the forum, you are, without a doubt, prejudiced and are with such an admittance should not, in my opinion, be welcome to this forum. Kent Hovind doesn't even have the degree of Prejudication that you possess."What does money or the head of a school have to do with this? You mean principles. Gee, some people. "
--Oh darn.. what an enormous mistake! Read it again and avoid being ignorant of the obvious."There is no common grounds, I follow science and you believe in pseudo-science."
--You follow science? I wouldn't follow something I don't understand.--I quote myself:

quote:

---

You have yet to even engaged in debate with me about anything scientific here, which you apparently avoid from your lack of potential flexibility to your evidently narrow minded personification.

---

--You have said nothing which displays that you have anything of any degree of credible to say here, and have done nothing but support my assertion that you continually yield your nescient attitude and unwanted predilection.--You also twisted my last statement, but I would again invite you to come to something relevent to this forum.--Just a question from speculation, but are you xstremefaith's evo twin?------------------[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 09-28-2002][This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 09-28-2002]

Originally posted by TrueCreation:--Then you should leave the forum, you are, without a doubt, prejudiced and are with such an admittance should not, in my opinion, be welcome to this forum. Kent Hovind doesn't even have the degree of Prejudication that you possess.You shouldn't project.--Oh darn.. what an enormous mistake! Read it again and avoid being ignorant of the obvious.Yes, it is a mistake, one of many on your part. Mistake #1: You're a creationists. This negates any change of you having a valid opinion.--You follow science? I wouldn't follow something I don't understand.And that is why you're a creationist instead of an evolutionist. Creationism doesn't require understanding, or higher brain functions for that matter, only faith and belief.[non sequitur deleted][This message has been edited by nos482, 09-28-2002]

"Mistake #1: You're a creationists. This negates any change of you having a valid opinion."
--You should appreciate the fact that I do not hold the athority of a moderator. You have lost my attention, are not worth any span of time, and have utterly & completely lost my interest.
--I have grown greatly annoyed of your tedious and futily persistant drivel. Enjoy my discussions from the sidelines, as you are not welcome until your attitude is no longer as you have displayed.-------------------[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 09-28-2002]

quote:

---

/B]

---

My theory is that nos is a rogue creationist trying to discredit the evilutionists. And, honestly, is doing a very good job of it.------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

"My theory is that nos is a rogue creationist trying to discredit the evilutionists. And, honestly, is doing a very good job of it."
--Schraftinator must have been very right with his analysis over here:http://EvC Forum: A listing of the contradictions and errors in the bible. -->EvC Forum: A listing of the contradictions and errors in the bible.--A direct import from the Yahoo 'athiest vs. Christian' debate chat rooms is my theory..------------------[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 09-28-2002]

Originally posted by TrueCreation:--You should appreciate the fact that I do not hold the athority of a moderator. You have lost my attention, are not worth any span of time, and have utterly & completely lost my interest.Please, you don't have the "athority" of a crossing guard. --I have grown greatly annoyed of your tedious and futily persistant drivel. Enjoy my discussions from the sidelines, as you are not welcome until your attitude is no longer as you have displayed.Glad to hear you admit your defeat.

Originally posted by John:My theory is that nos is a rogue creationist trying to discredit the evilutionists. And, honestly, is doing a very good job of it.Only the ones who want to boink underage girls.

quote:

---

Originally posted by TrueCreation:
"My theory is that nos is a rogue creationist trying to discredit the evilutionists. And, honestly, is doing a very good job of it."
--Schraftinator must have been very right with his analysis over here:

​

http://EvC Forum: A listing of the contradictions and errors in the bible. -->EvC Forum: A listing of the contradictions and errors in the bible.

​

--A direct import from the Yahoo 'athiest vs. Christian' debate chat rooms is my theory..

​

---

Maybe, but for the fact that I'm not an atheist.And you insult our intelligence with your creationism.

"Only the ones who want to boink underage girls. "
--Oh my goodness...this is pitiful.. Percy... I leave this little sprout[with emphasis] for you to decide the most suitable course of action.------------------[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 09-28-2002]

quote:

---

Originally posted by nos482:
Originally posted by John:

​

My theory is that nos is a rogue creationist trying to discredit the evilutionists. And, honestly, is doing a very good job of it.

​

Only the ones who want to boink underage girls.

---

I am getting very tired of the slander, nos.Admins: This baseless character assassination is really starting to piss me off.------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

quote:

---

Originally posted by nos482:

​

Maybe, but for the fact that I'm not an atheist.

​

And you insult our intelligence with your creationism.

---

Right TC, nos is Wiccan ( my guess ) which is FAR better supported scientifically than creationism. ------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

"Right TC, nos is Wiccan ( my guess ) which is FAR better supported scientifically than creationism. "
--But of course!------------------

quote:

---

Originally posted by John:

quote:

---

Originally posted by nos482:
Originally posted by John:

​

My theory is that nos is a rogue creationist trying to discredit the evilutionists. And, honestly, is doing a very good job of it.

​

Only the ones who want to boink underage girls.

---

​

I am getting very tired of the slander, nos.

​

Admins: This baseless character assassination is really starting to piss me off.

​

---

They're your own words from your website."When ought the cops let me bonk her?"[This message has been edited by nos482, 09-28-2002]