If someone makes an appeal to authority, they should be prepared to have said authorities credibility examined. When said expert turns out to be an embarrassment and who by his own testimonies appears to not have read anything in his chosen field of study for at least 10 years expect people to question the credibility of his statements. Behe claims a number of times that science can't explain things that it turns out science does a pretty damn good job explaining. Vash has a habit of proclaiming Behe quotes as truth but fails to defend the validity of those statements. I doubt he can, since even Michael Behe can't support his own ideas. Feel free to read if you want, transcripts of his testimony at the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District case starts here.
Kitzmiller v. Dover: Day 10, AM: Michael Behe
To the OP, I think that the evidence speaks for itself, but for those looking for supernatural explainations, they will refuse to look at the accumulation of evidence and refuse to interprete it in an honest manner.
-x
Idiots speak louder than words
(yes its supposed to be ironical... twice)
™ Version 4.2
