How can Biologists believe in the ToE?

I actually spent a fair amount of time on this site. It was e-mailed to me by a family member and though he took it serious - I did manage spray coke on my monitor laughing too hard.Here is a good one regarding the Oklo reactor:

quote:

---

This particular group of reactors was, incredibly moderated using --water.

---

and another:

quote:

---

There are at least six zones of depleted uranium (usually means mined)with plutonium as a by product! You've got to really be trying to manufacture plutonium--its a complicated process.

---

-Ooparts: Evidence of Ancient Atomic Knowledge?I am certainly not an expert at nuclear reactions, but the author of this site is just feeding junk to the gullible. "complicated process" - That is what happens to U238, it becomes plutonium239.Has it not become evidenced, based on your posts here, that it would be a good idea to start checking your sources? This site is full of bad information and questionable "out of place objects", its a fun read though.

Creationism was also thought to be fact until it was shown otherwise. ToE is not about how it started. That would be abiogenesis or further back Big Bang. The real question then is do you have any publications to show you are correct? Yet one side can land a man on the moon, cure diseases, and predict discoveries years in advance. For having serious problems the scientific method just seems to work. It would be quite bizarre considering its predicability. No, you where talking about science and creationism, in regards to creationism there is little difference. Did you hear the one about the global conspiracy by scientists to hide the truth about ToE?Edited by Vacate, : Spelling

and lacks evidence. Good point, but you need to talk to the other side. No, the problem is when people try to say that evolution is about 'origins' when it is nothing of the sort. ToE is not about the origin of life or the universe. Is that an adequate place to start?The Universe according to ToE:1- Infinite or Finite - Does not matter, may have an impact on the future of evolution if its finite and drawing to a close.2- Random or Complex - Impacts the origins of the universe: not part of the Theory of Evolution. Odd idea, but I have heard worse. I prefer Big Bang, no stray particles nessesary.3- Cause and Effect - You are once again talking about the origin of the universe and not covered by ToE.4- Judgement Criteria - From what I understand about T=0 philosophical ideas are all that applies. I agree with you but still maintain that ToE does not cover this topic. I agree based on what I understand of the topic. My preliminary statement to your post would be - you do not understand what the Theory of Evolution is about. If you wanted to talk about pre-Big Bang I think you just made a pretty good case.Edited by Vacate, : Formatting

This isnt quite what you said earlier. What happened to the Air Borne [Fowl] kind? Chickens giving birth to penguins, hummingbirds, and crows...If you want to elaborate I am curious about your groupings. I posted on RAZDs thread about your categories of kind, if you are willing I believe that they need some clarity.
Problems of a different "Kind"

Increased fundementalism and degrading education system resulting in increased rates of people being oblivious to science. You really are onto something here. This can be evidenced by the increasing rates of people who keep saying "Its just a theory". Its really quite sad.

Its science. How long have you been here and you still don't know why science avoids religious beliefs? Down with Big Bang!! Sounds too much like Goddidit. You mean biologists right? You often confuse ToE with Big Bang, so I want to be sure you don't mean all scientists. The True North strong and free!

quote:

---

The Canadian dollar gained more than a cent and a half to reach a new 31-year closing high of $1.0185 US.

​

That's the dollar's biggest one-day gain against the U.S. currency since June 1, 1970 ” when the Canadian dollar was permitted to float.

​

Propelling the loonie's jump was a report out Friday that said Canada's economy churned out 51,100 new jobs in September ” which was much better than expected and enough to lower the country's unemployment rate to 5.9 per cent.

​

That's the lowest jobless rate since November 1974, Statistics Canada said.

---

Canada is doing ok, but I am biased.

Reasonable? You, like many others have not even shown to grasp what the words mean. You do not know what science means. You do not know what theory means

You had not specified that a measure of a countries superiority was how many other countries wish to blow it up. I was thinking more along the lines of a strong economy and low unemployment, how silly of me.So based on your idea of what makes a country superior, who would you vote as top of the list?

Your bias has shown through. How convenient that what you decide is the measure of a countries worth is also the country of your faith. Don't feel bad, I love my country. I'm not. Its a sad state of affairs. I see no reason for us to help out in the US campaign to add to the ever growing list of countries they wish to blow up. They sure do add to the merit of those muslim countries though.

My fault. Thats what I was thinking.On with the show.