I believe that it is a theory but not the only theory.
No, it is not the only theory. Lamarckism is another theory for example. However ToE is the most complete and consistent scientific theory to explain how populations change over generations.
I believe in the theory that in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth, as I have stated in other threads.
That is not a scientific theory though. That's a theological theory.
As I understand it there has been much change that has taken place within kinds. This is a proven fact.
Well - actually it isn't proven - we don't have a testable definition of a kind. So we can't test the hypothesis. So it isn't close to having been proven.
It is not a proven fact that one kind became another kind.
Agreed. As I said 'the only real issue is how much change has occurred'
It is not a proven fact where the universe came from.
Which is nothing to do with a biological theory of population change.
It is not a proven fact where life came from.
Which is nothing to do with a biological theory of population change, unless we define populations in such a way to include entities which are not living.
So, basically you agree with me that you accept the ToE, you just disagree with both the consenus view of natural history and that the ToE can account for the changes proposed by the consensus view of natural hisory.