quote:
Why is human evolution alleged as proven fact based upon a paucity of physical fossil evidence ?
Millions of years to get erect yet an amount of disputed body of evidence that could fit into a medium sized box at best = so much based on so little = irrational belief not supported by the evidence.
I think I replied to you a few weeks ago on this very subject. Why must you ignore things just because they are rare? While I believe your "medium sized box" analogy is a bit flawed, I am willing to admit that the fossils are few and far between when compared to other types of animals. However, saying that the fossils are rare and just ignoring them does not explain their existance.
Willowtree, how would you explain the existance of these fossils, however uncommon, if they did not arise by evolution? Keep in mind that dozens of skeletons and artifacts have been found from early Homo sapiens, Neanderthals, Homo erectus, and many others, many in quite good condition.