Uhh, yeah!!! Why, are you suggesting that we can determine a change in allele frequency by looking at the incomplete fossils from animals who lived an ALLEGED 30 to 50 million years ago? I mean, I get the direct impression that you people think that graph RAZD posted represents millions of years of perfectly preserved skeletons of these animals. But only because that's the impression the evolutionists description gives, of course.
Let me correct you...this is the explanation that is currently offered by the
teams of scientists that study these fossils. It's not one person spouting some crackpot theory, it's a bunch of well educated folks who have nothing to gain and everything to lose if they are caught fudging their research.
I'm going to inject a little reality into this debate in order to educate you innocents so as to inoculate you somewhat against the pseudo intellectualism these wannabe scientists promote at every turn around here as they bluster with such assurance about things they have absolutely no real and actual clue about. Let's start with decomposition and the survival of the remains of dead animals in the real world. Let's see what happens to a similar sized animal to the Pelycodus after death using high speed time lapse video. This is following this rabbit for 8 days after death in a protected environment where no predators can contribute to consuming it and carry off the bones. It is safe to say that this rabbit wouldn't have lasted even the 8 days it took it to decompose naturally had predators had access to the remains.
So...you're telling me that fossils are only made by god's sparkly pixie magic? Fossilization is a rare but well understood process which can be easily understood with a little study. The only source of bluster here is you scooter.
Given this reality, how do you propose that generation after generation of Pelycodus fossils survived to be slowly and methodically preserved in layers of strata which left us with a perfectly datable record of when they lived and died? Can any of you intellectual giants explain this problem in the face of an actual video which exposes real time reality for once, apart from actual predators carrying off the bones of course,? Any takers???
Do you now how many Pelycodus fossils have been found to date? Why aren't they mixed in with the trilobites, dinosaurs and humans? You have to offer a better explanation; which, by the way, does not mean one in all caps.
WOW, this is quite a rant. When did I say that science attempts to indoctrinate kids even though I know that evolution does exactly that!
We'll accept that as a plea of guilty then.
I AM ANTI-EVOLUTION BECAUSE IT IS A PHILOSOPHY RATHER THAN A PROVABLE OR VERIFIABLE SCIENCE.
No, maybe it'll help if I use caps: YOU ARE AN ANTI-EVOLUTIONIST BECAUSE YOU REFUSE TO LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE FOR YOURSELF.
LIE TO YOURSELF IF YOU LIKE, MY DELUDED FRIEND, BUT DON'T YOU DARE EXPECT ME TO BELIEVE OR ACCEPT YOUR LIES. EVOLUTION IS A FALSE SCIENCE WHICH HAS NO FOUNDATION IN FACTS AT ALL. IF IT DID, THEN DISHONEST ASSUMPTIONS AND MISLEADING CONCLUSIONS WOULDN'T BE ITS SOP.
Have I said something that bothers you? Could you please
try to act like a big kid when you're among adults?
Do you know opponents have been predicting the death of the Theory of Evolution ever since Darwin. It's still here...and getting stronger.
I mentioned this in an earlier post and I want to try to focus you onto the topic: evolution is change in populations over time. We can see this not only in lab experiments, but in examples of ring species and yes, even in the fossil record. Change
is the fact of evolution.
I can only assume that you can prove what you say...we're waiting. The subject is "Evolution is a Fact"...here's your chance to offer evidence that shows populations never change.
Edited by Tanndarr, : Finishing sentences
™ Version 4.2