How many human generations are supposed to have occurred to take humans from apes or from australopithicines?
Hundreds of thousands seems to be in the right ball park.
Bacteria have been followed through 40000 generations + by Lenski at Michigan State U. The E.Coli he's studied are still very much E.Coli
Mamals may have a much higher evolutive potential then bacteria, requiring fewer generations in order to aquire significant evolutionary change.
Well the build up of human mutations in the human genome is an indication of which way evolution is actually heading.
All you are giving here is enuendo. where's the evidence?
Are you suggesting that we should say that something we can't see definately did happen until we find evidence against it. Why shouldn't we wait before making statements of so-called 'fact' until we at least have some evidence to support it.
I can't see nuclear reactions in the center of the sun, but I definately believe that it does happen and I will continue to do so until I see some strong REAL evidence against it. Why? Because the evidence for nuclear reactions inside the sun is very strong. In fact, so strong that it is considered incontrovertable. That's why it's called a fact.
That's what we've been trying to tell you for several post now. There a lot of evidence for evolution. In fact, the evidence for evolution is strong enough to be considered incontrovertable. That's why evolution is considered afact. And the best theory put forward to explain evolution so far has been Darwin's theory of evolution.
Now, some people seem unable to accept evolution. That's their problem. The burden is on them to find evidence against evolution.
I'll ask it again.
Would you care to show us any REAL experimental evidence against evolution?