Fast Eddy, I'm quoting part of Percy's reply to make sure I'm understanding your position. Question is at the bottom.
quote:
Originally posted by Percipient:
So I think you and Schraf are actually discussing on two different levels. To the extent you're arguing Creationism is science you'll get strong resistance from the science side. In particular you'll get strong objections about pushing religious beliefs into public schools. But if you're only arguing that God's truth is greater than science and cannot be contained or explained by science, then you'll get no argument from me and I suspect from few others.
Good post and generally I agree especially on the scientific aspect. One important side issue for many Christians though is why is the physical world would be inconsistent with God's word. From what I gather you (now meaning Fast Eddy) don't hold Genesis to be literal, so perhaps this doesn't even register as a problem. However, where do you feel there must be differences between the Bible and what biological evolution proposes?
Thanks,
Larry