Register | Sign In

Understanding through Discussion

EvC Forum active members: 53 (9179 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: Anig
Post Volume: Total: 918,044 Year: 5,301/9,624 Month: 326/323 Week: 170/160 Day: 6/38 Hour: 0/1

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Starlight and Time---question that must be answered
Aryeh Shavit
Inactive Member

Message 75 of 84 (27825)
12-25-2002 2:40 AM
Reply to: Message 74 by Brad McFall
12-24-2002 11:13 PM

Hi all,
Dr. Russell Humphreys’ book has been out for some 8 years, if I am not quite mistaken.
I wonder what has been the reaction of the academic world till now. I am aware only of the comments by Samuel N. Corner and Don N. Page as well as Dr. Hugh Ross. All those comments were highly unfavorable of Russell Humphreys’ book.
I wonder if there were any other academic comments on the book? I have an impression that the book caused some struggle between the Old Earth and Young Earth creationists but the majority of physicists and astronomers didn’t even notice it. Is this impression correct?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Brad McFall, posted 12-24-2002 11:13 PM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by Brad McFall, posted 12-29-2002 10:17 PM Aryeh Shavit has replied

Aryeh Shavit
Inactive Member

Message 81 of 84 (28091)
12-30-2002 2:41 AM
Reply to: Message 80 by Brad McFall
12-29-2002 10:17 PM

Originally posted by Brad McFall:
A, I havent tried to research this but when "Mere Creation" came out, I bought it and tried to read Ross himself but unlike my experience with Humphreys this was *not* the same pleasent experience. If ICR backs up some creationist then I have in these cases never been dissatisfied when I finally get/got around to putting my mind to the thoughts within the "promotion". I was also not satisfied with the way that I heard Ross come across the "air-waves" from Janet Partial's American Station on Earth but then that was before I compared Janet to the BAD GIRLS of the Bible (to whom I jocularly refer GOOD DAY LIVE Dorthoy and ZoloffCanadaGirl-Jill (both claimed "Catholic") which came on at the same time recently.
Hmmm I would say, Brad, that reading Isaac Asimov’s stories is even more pleasant.
However the question remains: did the mainstream physicists and astronomers even notice Humphreys’s book and regard it as science, not science fiction?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Brad McFall, posted 12-29-2002 10:17 PM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by Brad McFall, posted 12-31-2002 1:28 PM Aryeh Shavit has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024