Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,745 Year: 4,002/9,624 Month: 873/974 Week: 200/286 Day: 7/109 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why Parallel Universes?
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 502 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 16 of 67 (136381)
08-23-2004 8:04 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Mike Holland
08-23-2004 8:28 AM


Re: Multiple univewrses?
Mike the unwiz writes:
To put it in more every-day terms, there has to be a universe where every penny that was ever tossed landed heads, and statistics just doesn't exist.
You are confused. Probability, or statistics, tells us the likelihood or the unlikelihood of an event. It is not the absolute truth.
There is nothing to prevent all pennies from landing heads.
The multi-verse is confusing to us mortals, just like almost everything in quantum physics. However, just because we mortals can't understand it yet doesn't mean it is not the case.

The Laminator
We are the bog. Resistance is voltage over current.
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Mike Holland, posted 08-23-2004 8:28 AM Mike Holland has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Darwin Storm, posted 08-23-2004 10:47 PM coffee_addict has replied
 Message 18 by Primordial Egg, posted 08-24-2004 6:10 AM coffee_addict has not replied

  
Darwin Storm
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 67 (136410)
08-23-2004 10:47 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by coffee_addict
08-23-2004 8:04 PM


Re: Multiple univewrses?
The difference is that QM has observable data, with a comprehensive theory which describes the phenomenea very accuratley (though the why is still not there). Parrellel universes theories currently have not testable means of verification or disverification. Consequently, any notion of multiple universes is conjecture. There are several hypothesis that predict them, but currently, there is no evidence to support the existance of such universes.
This message has been edited by Darwin Storm, 08-23-2004 09:49 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by coffee_addict, posted 08-23-2004 8:04 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by coffee_addict, posted 08-25-2004 3:25 AM Darwin Storm has not replied

  
Primordial Egg
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 67 (136490)
08-24-2004 6:10 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by coffee_addict
08-23-2004 8:04 PM


Re: Multiple univewrses?
You are confused. Probability, or statistics, tells us the likelihood or the unlikelihood of an event. It is not the absolute truth.
There is nothing to prevent all pennies from landing heads.
I don't think Mike's confused here at all - he's just saying that statistical methods would not have been developed if there were not different outcomes (what would be the point?). It reminds me of a riddle I once heard:
Q. If you toss a coin 1000 times and it lands heads every time what are the chances of it coming up heads on the 1001th toss?
A. Pretty close to one. The coin is obviously loaded.
The multi-verse is confusing to us mortals, just like almost everything in quantum physics. However, just because we mortals can't understand it yet doesn't mean it is not the case.
I fully agree with you here - for me its the one satisfying answer to the question of 'why is there something rather than nothing?' Actually, there's everything.
PE

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by coffee_addict, posted 08-23-2004 8:04 PM coffee_addict has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Mike Holland, posted 08-24-2004 7:24 PM Primordial Egg has not replied

  
Mike Holland
Member (Idle past 509 days)
Posts: 179
From: Sydney, NSW,Auistralia
Joined: 08-30-2002


Message 19 of 67 (136633)
08-24-2004 7:24 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Primordial Egg
08-24-2004 6:10 AM


Re: Multiple universes?
O)K. I admit my gut feels have a dissonance with my logic. As correctly stated, somewhere in an infinite universe all penny-tosses have resulted in heads. And the next toss? Of course it will also land heads (in one of the resulting universes).
Also, in an infinite universe, there are an infinity of 'me's sitting at PCs typing this response.
I think I will stick with my gut feel. I don't believe it.
But thanks for the responses.
Mike.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Primordial Egg, posted 08-24-2004 6:10 AM Primordial Egg has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by coffee_addict, posted 08-25-2004 3:30 AM Mike Holland has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 502 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 20 of 67 (136698)
08-25-2004 3:25 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by Darwin Storm
08-23-2004 10:47 PM


Re: Multiple univewrses?
I agree with you on the point of lack of data at this time.
DS writes:
Parrellel universes theories currently have not testable means of verification or disverification.
Haven't you seen Stargate SG-1? The episode where Daniel Jackson crossed into another "quantum reality" confirms our suspicion of the multiple universes conjecture.

The Laminator
We are the bog. Resistance is voltage over current.
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Darwin Storm, posted 08-23-2004 10:47 PM Darwin Storm has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 502 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 21 of 67 (136702)
08-25-2004 3:30 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Mike Holland
08-24-2004 7:24 PM


Re: Multiple universes?
MH writes:
I think I will stick with my gut feel. I don't believe it.
Well, there are a lot of people that don't believe it. Only some of them don't believe it for the right reason, that there's simply no data to support it.
You might want to be be careful about that gut feeling of yours. People had the gut feelings about the causes of the bubonic plague for centuries before they found out the real causes. Gut feelings are good in the halls of L.A. high schools, but they're certainly not sufficient in other matters, like getting your next date.

The Laminator
We are the bog. Resistance is voltage over current.
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Mike Holland, posted 08-24-2004 7:24 PM Mike Holland has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Mike Holland, posted 08-25-2004 4:06 AM coffee_addict has not replied

  
Mike Holland
Member (Idle past 509 days)
Posts: 179
From: Sydney, NSW,Auistralia
Joined: 08-30-2002


Message 22 of 67 (136703)
08-25-2004 4:06 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by coffee_addict
08-25-2004 3:30 AM


Re: Multiple universes?
Thanks for the tip, Darth, but I am an old codger of 66, happily married for 40 years, so I won't be looking for any dates in the near future.
Hope you enjoy your next date in the majority of universes.
Mike.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by coffee_addict, posted 08-25-2004 3:30 AM coffee_addict has not replied

  
happy_atheist
Member (Idle past 4939 days)
Posts: 326
Joined: 08-21-2004


Message 23 of 67 (136779)
08-25-2004 12:11 PM


Well i'll agree that there isn't any data (that I know of anyway) supporting parallel universes. It's simply a stab in the dark at explaining strange quantum mechanical phenomena. Is it definately untestable though? I don't know...

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Primordial Egg, posted 08-25-2004 12:36 PM happy_atheist has not replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 24 of 67 (136786)
08-25-2004 12:30 PM


Thread moved here from the Miscellaneous Topics in Creation/Evolution forum.

  
Primordial Egg
Inactive Member


Message 25 of 67 (136787)
08-25-2004 12:36 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by happy_atheist
08-25-2004 12:11 PM


quantum suicide
Is it definately untestable though? I don't know...
Put a gun to your temple and fire it. There's an extremely small probability of the bullet quantum-tunnelling through your brain and out on the other side leaving you completely unharmed.
So, if you pull the trigger and discover you're still alive, its a pretty good case for multiple universes. Of course, in the majority of Universes, they'd be scraping you off the wall.
You'd have to be a nutter to try this though.
PE
http://www.hep.upenn.edu/~max/everett_guardian.html

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by happy_atheist, posted 08-25-2004 12:11 PM happy_atheist has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by coffee_addict, posted 08-25-2004 2:38 PM Primordial Egg has replied
 Message 29 by Darwin Storm, posted 08-27-2004 6:39 PM Primordial Egg has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 502 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 26 of 67 (136801)
08-25-2004 2:38 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Primordial Egg
08-25-2004 12:36 PM


Re: quantum suicide
There are over 6 billion people on this planet. I propose that we give each person on the planet a gun and have them shoot themselves. Out of 6 billion, there's bound to be someone that will survive such an experiment and prove the multiple universe hypothesis.

The Laminator
We are the bog. Resistance is voltage over current.
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Primordial Egg, posted 08-25-2004 12:36 PM Primordial Egg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Primordial Egg, posted 08-25-2004 3:22 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
Primordial Egg
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 67 (136816)
08-25-2004 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by coffee_addict
08-25-2004 2:38 PM


Re: quantum suicide
Only works if you're doing it yourself, unfortunately.
Most of the time you'll be dead but it only takes one universe (identical in all respects to this one up to the point the bullet leaves the gun) in which you miraculously survive - for your consciousness to be continuous afterwards.
The downside of this is that everyone else will just be living their lives so you'll have a hard time convincing anyone else of what just happened (I know I do )
What you could do as well is rig the set-up in such a way that you definitely kill yourself if and only if your lottery numbers don't come up. They'll come up in one Universe, which has been identical to this Universe. You would be the same person, done the very same things and thought the exact same thoughts throughout your life. You'd be guaranteed to be alive and rich at the same time!
Disclaimer: I in no way condone the taking's of one's life in order to become fantastically wealthy beyone your wildest dreams and solve what is perhaps one of the hardest problems of them all.
PE

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by coffee_addict, posted 08-25-2004 2:38 PM coffee_addict has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Christian7, posted 08-27-2004 6:32 PM Primordial Egg has replied

  
Christian7
Member (Idle past 274 days)
Posts: 628
From: n/a
Joined: 01-19-2004


Message 28 of 67 (137495)
08-27-2004 6:32 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Primordial Egg
08-25-2004 3:22 PM


Re: quantum suicide
Ah, but would your same self-awareness and conciousness jump to that univers. If not that you would not experience it. You alternate body would live but not with your conciousness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Primordial Egg, posted 08-25-2004 3:22 PM Primordial Egg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Primordial Egg, posted 08-27-2004 7:25 PM Christian7 has not replied

  
Darwin Storm
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 67 (137498)
08-27-2004 6:39 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Primordial Egg
08-25-2004 12:36 PM


Re: quantum suicide
1st) The quantum probability for such a scenario is so low you could endlessly repeat the experiment till the heat death of the universe and still not have it occur. Just because there is a probablity, doesnt mean it is likely to happen.
2nd) Even if a quantum event such as that occurs, it doesn;t verify or unverify any hypothesis about alternate universes, since quantum mechanics doesnt say why it works, it just describes the how. We have quantum tunnelling events all the time on the microscopic (actually submicrosopic level). It is a accepted facet of QM. I don't understand how you could draw this out to be evidence for multiple universes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Primordial Egg, posted 08-25-2004 12:36 PM Primordial Egg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Primordial Egg, posted 08-27-2004 7:40 PM Darwin Storm has not replied

  
Primordial Egg
Inactive Member


Message 30 of 67 (137504)
08-27-2004 7:25 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by Christian7
08-27-2004 6:32 PM


Re: quantum suicide
Ah, but would your same self-awareness and conciousness jump to that univers. If not that you would not experience it. You alternate body would live but not with your conciousness.
Not sure what you mean by consciousness "jumping universe" - the universes in which you die your consciousness ends - the universe in which you live, your consciousness continues. Since the Universes diverge only at the point of firing your experience is that of the guy who's survived (how could it be otherwise?)
PE

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Christian7, posted 08-27-2004 6:32 PM Christian7 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024