Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,810 Year: 4,067/9,624 Month: 938/974 Week: 265/286 Day: 26/46 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A timeless God can exist.
PetVet2Be
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 27 (326269)
06-26-2006 1:02 AM


That is exactly the response I was expecting. Evolution has nothing to start with and in order to get around that you just say that the fact that you dont know where the original matter came from is irrevelant. Of course its relevant. Without the starting matter how could the matter that isnt there go bang? So the question still stands where did the original matter come from.

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by arachnophilia, posted 06-26-2006 1:11 AM PetVet2Be has not replied
 Message 25 by cavediver, posted 06-26-2006 7:20 PM PetVet2Be has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1371 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 17 of 27 (326271)
06-26-2006 1:11 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by PetVet2Be
06-26-2006 1:02 AM


Of course its relevant.
suppose i am studying the history of automobile design. we're looking at all the shapes that chevies and fords go through, versus japanese cars, etc.
is the formation of the universe relevant to the discussion? further, since this discussion is about the formation of the universe, is the history of automobile design relevant to the formation of the universe?
So the question still stands where did the original matter come from.
and the answer to that question has nothing to do with evolution, at all.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by PetVet2Be, posted 06-26-2006 1:02 AM PetVet2Be has not replied

  
PetVet2Be
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 27 (326277)
06-26-2006 1:29 AM


You are saying that what you believe is based on nothing. Evolution has no foundation. Now who is being unscientific?

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by MangyTiger, posted 06-26-2006 1:57 AM PetVet2Be has replied

  
MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6380 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 19 of 27 (326285)
06-26-2006 1:57 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by PetVet2Be
06-26-2006 1:29 AM


You are saying that what you believe is based on nothing. Evolution has no foundation. Now who is being unscientific?
The starting point of the Theory Of Evolution is that life already exists. How it got there is of no interest or importance to the Theory Of Evolution.
It is, of course, of great interest and importance as an area of study in its own right (called abiogenesis as I'm sure you know).

Oops! Wrong Planet

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by PetVet2Be, posted 06-26-2006 1:29 AM PetVet2Be has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by PetVet2Be, posted 06-26-2006 2:23 AM MangyTiger has replied

  
PetVet2Be
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 27 (326293)
06-26-2006 2:23 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by MangyTiger
06-26-2006 1:57 AM


Why then do text books teach the big bang as the beginning of the universe? Because if they do not they must accept God did it and the Bible already tells how God and they dont like how he did it so they have to come up with something to fill the gap. The only logical explination is that something or someone who is not bound by our natural laws and has always existed started life. Chance does not work for out of nothing came something is not scientific yet this is what evolutionists have to accept. This is why many Christians can be discredited. They compromised on their beliefs and threw out the first several chapters of their Bibles. If the beginning of the Bible is not true then the whole thing is unbelievable. So I propose the question: Do you believe God created it or that it all sprang from nothingness?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by MangyTiger, posted 06-26-2006 1:57 AM MangyTiger has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by arachnophilia, posted 06-26-2006 2:36 AM PetVet2Be has not replied
 Message 24 by MangyTiger, posted 06-26-2006 6:29 PM PetVet2Be has not replied
 Message 27 by pesto, posted 06-27-2006 4:09 PM PetVet2Be has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1371 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 21 of 27 (326298)
06-26-2006 2:36 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by PetVet2Be
06-26-2006 2:23 AM


Why then do text books teach the big bang as the beginning of the universe?
big bang ≠ evolution. no matter what kent hovind told you.
"evolution" is the variation of heritable features in a population from one generation to the next.
"the theory of evolution" or colloqually "Evolution" with a capital e is the study of how that above fact has affected the history of the development of life on this planet.
neither of these is related to the big bang. the theory of evolution is marginally related to abiogenesis, or the origin of life. but that is a separate field. astronomy and cosmology is even further removed.
it is not a "catch-all" mythology designed to explain everything without a need for god.
Because if they do not they must accept God did it and the Bible already tells how God and they dont like how he did it so they have to come up with something to fill the gap.
unfortunately, the bible is not a science textbook.
This is why many Christians can be discredited. They compromised on their beliefs and threw out the first several chapters of their Bibles.
you've thrown out several chapters of your bible. if you'd like, in the appropriate forum, we can discuss which parts you ignore.
If the beginning of the Bible is not true then the whole thing is unbelievable.
all-or-nothing fundamentalism is a dangerous thing, petvet. it costs many people their faith.
Edited by arachnophilia, : typo


This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by PetVet2Be, posted 06-26-2006 2:23 AM PetVet2Be has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by lfen, posted 06-26-2006 2:57 AM arachnophilia has replied

  
lfen
Member (Idle past 4704 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 22 of 27 (326302)
06-26-2006 2:57 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by arachnophilia
06-26-2006 2:36 AM


Is evolution or big bang related to the OP???
Have I been infected with an admin meme? I don't know how I find myself pondering if evolution or big bang has anything to do with the OP.
PetVet is new here and probably should be given some gentle instruction about staying on topic instead of being encouraged to jump into any topic in any thread.
Isn't there a better thread for this discussion? Just a thought.
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by arachnophilia, posted 06-26-2006 2:36 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by arachnophilia, posted 06-26-2006 2:59 AM lfen has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1371 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 23 of 27 (326303)
06-26-2006 2:59 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by lfen
06-26-2006 2:57 AM


Re: Is evolution or big bang related to the OP???
yes, you are right. i was starting with the "religion in religion fora" and "science in science fora" but really, the whole damned thing is off topic.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by lfen, posted 06-26-2006 2:57 AM lfen has not replied

  
MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6380 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 24 of 27 (326590)
06-26-2006 6:29 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by PetVet2Be
06-26-2006 2:23 AM


Do you believe God created it or that it all sprang from nothingness?
I descibe my viewpoint on this as Triple-A - Apathetic Agnostic Atheist. To be more precise:
  • Atheist
    I find the Biblical literalist view that God created everything 6000 years ago laughably implausable
  • Agnostic
    Beyond that I don't know how the Universe came into being
  • Apathetic
    It doesn't matter to me that I don't know, and I don't think it is of any significance in the grand scheme of things either

Oops! Wrong Planet

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by PetVet2Be, posted 06-26-2006 2:23 AM PetVet2Be has not replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3670 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 25 of 27 (326602)
06-26-2006 7:20 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by PetVet2Be
06-26-2006 1:02 AM


So the question still stands where did the original matter come from.
Matter does not have to "come" from somewhere. There is no "conservation of matter" law. Just after the Big Bang there was no matter at all. Matter exists later when it can "condense" out of the matter fields.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by PetVet2Be, posted 06-26-2006 1:02 AM PetVet2Be has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by arachnophilia, posted 06-26-2006 8:45 PM cavediver has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1371 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 26 of 27 (326634)
06-26-2006 8:45 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by cavediver
06-26-2006 7:20 PM


There is no "conservation of matter" law.
...yes there is.
Conservation of mass - Wikipedia
it's just not exactly precise. you can convert matter to energy, or example, in nuclear reactions.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by cavediver, posted 06-26-2006 7:20 PM cavediver has not replied

  
pesto
Member (Idle past 5614 days)
Posts: 63
From: Chicago, IL
Joined: 04-05-2006


Message 27 of 27 (326893)
06-27-2006 4:09 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by PetVet2Be
06-26-2006 2:23 AM


the Bible already tells how God and they dont like how he did it so they have to come up with something to fill the gap.
It's interesting that the man who came up with the kernel of our current understanding of evolution was a Christian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by PetVet2Be, posted 06-26-2006 2:23 AM PetVet2Be has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024