chark writes:
That is all of the light, heat, and radiation energy in the universe (or gravitational vicinity) that is throwing off calculations.
The problem with this is that there aren't enough light around to account for the missing mass. As was pointed out earlier, fusion in a star convert very little mass into a lot of energy, relatively.
I believe it does but we can not effectively measure it since one atom contains in the upper billions of joules of energy and since we can not contain large enough amounts of energy to equal the corresponding amount of matter (according to E=mc2)in a large enough quanity to measure its gravity
If we invent a measuring instrument so sensitive that we can measure the affect a very massive object has on light, we can effectively measure how much gravity light has.
This is because F = Gm1m2/r^2
Normally, we only put the mass of the object into account. However, if we have a instrument sensitive enough, we can also put light into account.