|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Have we halted our own Evolution? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
U can call me Cookie Member (Idle past 4953 days) Posts: 228 From: jo'burg, RSA Joined: |
Physically, Phat, we look pretty much the same as we did then.
IF we became extinct, only the speculative ego-centrism of the human animal can imagine a universe going on its merry way without us and yet somehow stubbornly refusing to believe that God sent His one and only Son to save us. Yes....we are that special and paradoxically that needy! Not really sure what you mean by this. Are you saying that it is the ego that allows us to envision a world without humanity? Could it not be said that it is the ego that causes such a humanless world to be unpalatable, if not unimaginable? I do not deny that we are special, yet no more special than that atom floating past your nose right now. And i kinda agree, we need all the help we can get! Of course, as you emphasised, this is speculation; however, based on the direction humanity has taken. U wanna bet me i'm wrong? "The good Christian should beware the mathematician and all those who make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that the mathematicians have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and to confine man in the bonds of hell." - St. Augustine
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1467 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Just for the sake of speculation, what do you see the human animal evolving into in...say...5000 more years? Just like we are now, only more so.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Just like we are now, only more so. And evolved. LOL Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Just for the sake of speculation, what do you see the human animal evolving into in...say...5000 more years?
Just like we are now, only more so. I think that when people talk about humans not evolving anymore, they really mean that our morphology will have no noticable changes. Its like the morphological changes are the visual clues to the occurance of evolution so when we stop 'seeing' the changes then those changes must have stopped, even thought this is not true. Just thought I'd point that out. And I, like you, don't think we will see any morphological change to our species, but I, unlike you, like to think of this as a result of our affect on our evolution
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ramoss Member (Idle past 612 days) Posts: 3228 Joined: |
I thought that we are becoming a bit more gracile than were were 80K years ago, and the effect of agraculture is effecting us too.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1284 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
But could the ability to absorb more Glycogen be a possible next evolutionary step? or perhaps a more efficient way to store memory in our brains?
Is it not the case that we use a small percentage of our brains potential anyway? edit... our 'brian' has no potential... changed to 'brain' This message has been edited by Creavolution, 03-27-2006 02:01 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
U can call me Cookie Member (Idle past 4953 days) Posts: 228 From: jo'burg, RSA Joined: |
I don't know about that. According to Y chromosome and mtDNA data, the extant population closest to the hypothetical ancestral human population are the San, of south west Africa. If you've seen these people, you'd see that they are quite fine-boned; possibly one of the most gracile people on the planet.
If we ignore the diversity, genetic and morphological, of Africa (since it, as yet, has not been adequately explained), a significant amount of human diversity might be due to isolation by distance. Since, nowadays, this has become less of a factor, it could be hypothesised that human populations are not going to be differentiating as fast as they have in the past. Who knows, maybe places like SA and the US might each end up becoming one heterogeneous, admixed population, once the cultural barriers are broken down "The good Christian should beware the mathematician and all those who make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that the mathematicians have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and to confine man in the bonds of hell." - St. Augustine
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1467 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
And I, like you, don't think we will see any morphological change to our species, but I, unlike you, like to think of this as a result of our affect on our evolution Well, we've always had an effect on our own evolution. That's part of what sexual selection is about. Really, human "meddling" in our own genetics isn't really different than that. We've always had some degree of volition over our own gene pool, for as long as we've recognized the connection between sexual intercourse and reproduction.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18262 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
UCCMC writes: No---what I am saying is that it is the ego that allows us to collectively imagine a universe without God while at the same time using all of our human derived logic to imagine how the universe actually is. Not really sure what you mean by this. Are you saying that it is the ego that allows us to envision a world without humanity? Could it not be said that it is the ego that causes such a humanless world to be unpalatable, if not unimaginable? Its one thing to say that Biological Evolution makes sense---thats common sense.Same with Geology and other studies of our earth. Ruling God out of Cosmological arguments, however, seems to me that our faith is more in our human wisdom. For many of us, at least.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1467 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Ruling God out of Cosmological arguments, however, seems to me that our faith is more in our human wisdom. For many of us, at least. Not our wisdom; our intelligence. Not faith; but trust. And that trust is not misplaced. The history of human development, in these past few centuries alone, is testament to that fact.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18262 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
Crashfrog writes: Not faith; but trust. And that trust is not misplaced. The history of human development, in these past few centuries alone, is testament to that fact. I respect human wisdom. I have friends who have spent long and arduous hours at college gaining wisdom far removed from that of a simple praying monk. I too have attended college and I know that broadening the mind is an evolution of thoughts, concepts, and beliefs. I have also prayed with the "monk." Some would say that clinging to "outdated concepts and beliefs is halting the evolution of progressive thought. I can only tell you that I have experienced both evolution of ideas and information (education) and prayer and meditation (recreation) Recreation, to me, is impartation of a fresh spirit. Education is an evolution of existing ideas. The foundation of recreation is a Creator. The foundation of evolution is a human idea that is verifiable time and time again. Perhsaps one question is this: Will human sociological evolution view beliefs in a Deity (ities) as a mutation? Or is the impartation from a true Deity that pre-existed human evolutionary development a continuing refreshing of our spirit? Of course you know which side of this you believe, and I know which side I believe. All I can say to you, Crashfrog, is that there are Lily Pads in Heaven! What response do you have for me?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6476 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
I actually have wondered about this myself. In terms of human evolution, we are not really under selection at all. There may be selective forces that can shift some allele frequencies one way or another locally but the sort of radical shifts in the gene pool needed for speciation are not in sight. I remember a lecture by Richard Lewontin where he said that a catastrophe killing all humans on the planet except for the Kung would still leave about 85% of all human genetic variablility represented. It is hard to imagine much evolution occurring in such an environment when most selective pressures are relatively weak. Even disease causing agents such as HIV are poor selective pressures since they allow people to breed before killing them. It does not take much migration to cause a lot of admixture. If you couple that with a big decrease in isolation by distance, the human species is becoming one gigantic admixed population. Whether this remains so is not predictable as huge shifts in the climate or some other catastrophe can change things radically..even for successful species or groups...look at what happened to the dinosaurs..or trilobites.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1467 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
What response do you have for me? God bless, and go forward.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2170 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: No, if by that you mean that we only use a small percentage of our brain. We use all of our brain. Just not all at once. (Using all of the brain all at once is known as a "seizure")
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
U can call me Cookie Member (Idle past 4953 days) Posts: 228 From: jo'burg, RSA Joined: |
Ok , i think i get what you're saying.
However i don't think that the extinction of humanity presupposes the non-existence of God. At the most it implies that God didn't make everything especially for us. "The good Christian should beware the mathematician and all those who make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that the mathematicians have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and to confine man in the bonds of hell." - St. Augustine
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024