|
Author
|
Topic: Does Darwinism Equal "No God"?
|
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1464 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: 10-06-2001
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
I think I saw those drawings in a high school text book some time ago.
|
Asgara
Member (Idle past 2322 days) Posts: 1783 From: Wisconsin, USA Joined: 05-10-2003
|
|
Message 287 of 298 (272288)
12-23-2005 10:06 PM
|
Reply to: Message 286 by Faith
12-23-2005 10:02 PM
|
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
Faith, what is it...in msg 245 you say:
but I certainly remember when the Biogenetic Law was gospel, and ontogeny recapitulating phylogeny was drummed into my generation in high school and now 41 posts later:
I think I saw those drawings in a high school text book some time ago Which is it...you think you saw the pictures or the concept was drummed into your generation?
Asgara "I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now"
Save lives! Click here!Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC! http://asgarasworld.bravepages.comhttp://perditionsgate.bravepages.com
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 286 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:02 PM | | Faith has not replied |
|
MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6373 days) Posts: 989 From: Leicester, UK Joined: 07-30-2004
|
|
|
Message 288 of 298 (272290)
12-23-2005 10:08 PM
|
Reply to: Message 275 by randman
12-23-2005 9:17 PM
|
|
I'm an idiot
Sorry, I phrased my request poorly so what you posted wasn't what I was after (entirely my fault - off to bed with no supper for me  ). As all this off topic and the thread is nearing the end I won't pursue it. I might start a new topic after Christmas if I can be arsed.
I wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 275 by randman, posted 12-23-2005 9:17 PM | | randman has not replied |
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 289 of 298 (272292)
12-23-2005 10:09 PM
|
Reply to: Message 286 by Faith
12-23-2005 10:02 PM
|
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
I tried to explain it to Randman, but of course he wouldn't listen. Yes, ******* substituted dog embryos for humans. But it really didn't matter. The principle was accurate. My author pointed out that the dog embryos and the human embryos were almost identical.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 286 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:02 PM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 290 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:17 PM | | robinrohan has replied |
|
Faith
Suspended Member (Idle past 1464 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: 10-06-2001
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
Oh brother. Well I don't want to get into this endless discussion about ********** But that wasn't the charge against ********* The charge is that the embryos were NOT accurate, do NOT represent what really occurs. Also, if ontogeny does not recapitulate phylogeny (or is it the other way around?), what is the point of there being similarity between embryos anyway? DESIGN ECONOMY REIGNS!!!!
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 291 of 298 (272298)
12-23-2005 10:23 PM
|
Reply to: Message 290 by Faith
12-23-2005 10:17 PM
|
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
Oh brother I'm just telling you what my book says. Here's a quote: "Heackel had fraudulently substituted dog embryos for the human ones, but they were so similar to humans that these (if available) would have made the same point" (28). This message has been edited by robinrohan, 12-23-2005 09:24 PM
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 290 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:17 PM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 292 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:25 PM | | robinrohan has replied |
|
Faith
Suspended Member (Idle past 1464 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: 10-06-2001
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
I hope you realize that that information is cause for starting an entire new thread on *******. This message has been edited by Faith, 12-23-2005 10:25 PM
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 293 of 298 (272301)
12-23-2005 10:31 PM
|
Reply to: Message 292 by Faith
12-23-2005 10:25 PM
|
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
I hope you realize that that information is cause for starting an entire new thread on *******. Please. The point is that the idea was correct, according to my author. My book was published in 2001.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 292 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:25 PM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 294 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:39 PM | | robinrohan has replied |
|
Faith
Suspended Member (Idle past 1464 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: 10-06-2001
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
Well, I've found Randman's points credible so I'm now in the position of doubting Mayr.
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 295 of 298 (272311)
12-23-2005 10:51 PM
|
Reply to: Message 294 by Faith
12-23-2005 10:39 PM
|
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
Well, I've found Randman's points credible so I'm now in the position of doubting Mayr. I don't think it matters, Faith, what authors I use. You'll doubt them all. It doesn't matter what evidence I present. You'll dismiss it with contempt. However, I will soldier on.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 294 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:39 PM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 296 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 11:01 PM | | robinrohan has replied |
|
Faith
Suspended Member (Idle past 1464 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: 10-06-2001
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
Please don't. If you feel I'm treating you with contempt I think the discussion is simply over.
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 297 of 298 (272313)
12-23-2005 11:05 PM
|
Reply to: Message 296 by Faith
12-23-2005 11:01 PM
|
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
If you feel I'm treating you with contempt I think the discussion is simply over. Actually, I'm enjoying it. Don't take me too literally, Faith. I'm just an old joker. I have some things in mind that I think will convince you.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 296 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 11:01 PM | | Faith has not replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 298 of 298 (272321)
12-23-2005 11:46 PM
|
|
|
Closing time
And joy - It looks like robinrohan and Faith have managed to once again string together at least 3 messages each, that had absolutely no connection to the theme of the topic. Didn't I suspend you two for something along those lines once before? Take any responses to this message to the "General..." topic, link below (no new apology topic). Adminnemooseus This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 12-23-2005 11:47 PM
|
™ Version 4.2