Evolution makes no sense

quote:

---

Originally posted by Conspirator:
It's because evolutionists are so blinded by their own beliefs that they can't see the truth if it hit them in the ass.

​

I'll post my intense hatred for evolution/evolutionists real soon.

---

So, where'd you go, Conspirator?------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

quote:

---

Originally posted by mark24:
I'll give 10 to 1 that Conspirator lasts no more than a week. Any takers?

​

---

OK, I'm calling in those gambling debts........Mark------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

quote:

---

Originally posted by mark24:

​

OK, I'm calling in those gambling debts........

​

Mark

​

---

I was thinking about that too. If you start from Conspirators registration date, July 18, and take gene's post on the 23rd as the cut-off date, then he made it 5 days.If however, you start with C's first real post on the 22nd, he lasted ONE day!!!! Sheesh.... I thought he hated us much more than that. I mean, you'd think all that hate would provide more momentum than one day.------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

quote:

---

Originally posted by Conspirator:

​

Me::
You are suggesting in one breath that order cannot come from
disorder, and then relying on it in the next.

​

Conspirator::
How so?

​

I'm getting kind of tired posting this right now, so I'll address the rest of Peter's questions later.

---

You are stating that order from disorder means that DNA could
never have come into being through naturalistic processes,
but equally saying that random (disordered) flood events could
produce a consistent ordering in the fossil record.You have to have it one way or the other::Either you can get order from random events or you cannot.[This message has been edited by Peter, 07-29-2002]

--Me thinks that while I would love to respond to Conspirators lengthy post, that It would be a futile offering if he isn't going to respond back.------------------

quote:

---

Originally posted by TrueCreation:
--Me thinks that while I would love to respond to Conspirators lengthy post, that It would be a futile offering if he isn't going to respond back.

​

---

Yes, I am sad that my last post shall die an unresponded death.------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

quote:

---

Originally posted by John:

quote:

---

Originally posted by TrueCreation:
--Me thinks that while I would love to respond to Conspirators lengthy post, that It would be a futile offering if he isn't going to respond back.

​

---

​

Yes, I am sad that my last post shall die an unresponded death.

​

---

Don't worry John, we still appreciate you. Did anyone else get the feeling that first lengthy post was a cut-and-paste? Syntax and grammar didn't seem to match the subsequent ones. Maybe s/he'll be back and explain where s/he's coming from.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Quetzal:

​

Don't worry John, we still appreciate you. Did anyone else get the feeling that first lengthy post was a cut-and-paste? Syntax and grammar didn't seem to match the subsequent ones. Maybe s/he'll be back and explain where s/he's coming from.

​

---

Hi Quetzal...Welcome back.------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

I'm thinking that I can't gamble against you on that one Mark, maybe someone can catch him in another more...unintelligable forum. Maybe Dr. Dino has his long awaited forum up and working? It would be a hoot to see the style of moderation on that one.------------------[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 08-02-2002]

[QUOTE][B]Did anyone else get the feeling that first lengthy post was a cut-and-paste?[/QUOTE][/B]I've got much more than a "feeling".From Top Evidences Against Evolution "Evidence #4" [QUOTE][B]The supposed hominids (creatures in-between ape and human that evolutionists believe used to exist) bones and skull record used by evolutionists often consists of `finds' which are thoroughly unrevealing and inconsistent. They are neither clear nor conclusive even though evolutionists present them as if they were.[/QUOTE][/B]From Conspirator's post 19 in this thread: [QUOTE][B]The supposed hominids bones and skull record used by evolutionists often consists of "finds" which are thoroughly unrevealing and inconsistent. They neither clear nor conclusive though evolutionists present them as if they were.[/QUOTE][/B]From Conspirator's post: [QUOTE][B]Nine of the twelve supposed hominids are actually extinct apes/monkeys and not part human at all.[/QUOTE][/B]From "Top Evidences....Evidence #5" [QUOTE][B]Nine of the twelve popularly supposed hominids are actually extinct apes/ monkeys and not part human at all.[/QUOTE][/B]The "Top Evidences" site is large and it will take a little time before I can find out what is Original Conspirator and what is not. I thought there was something wrong with his post and I ran phrases from it through Google, fishing for hits. I do this frequently, but this time it took several phrases. I also did this shortly after his message was posted but after the first two phrases returned nothing I was satisfied that it was his.His bizarre Cow Cannibalism comments are here.[This message has been edited by gene90, 08-02-2002]

[QUOTE][B]
Natural selection, the driving mechanism for evolution is totally inadequate. It along with mutations is said to have caused organisms to evolve from one basic kind[/QUOTE][/B]THEREin lies the rub. The Cornell Degree is inadequate but I would not even as an evolutionist go so far as to say that Maxwell's idea of polarized light and jellyfish was uncalled for. Evolutionists who do not look on Math as Newton and Pascal did do not see this creation as I do and they are free to the same chance to be correct. I would have bet against the adequecy as well but I still asert that Provine saw two landscapes when there was one. [QUOTE][B] (animals which can reproduce with each other) into another basic kind. This is prohibited genetically since all of the information for the development of an organism has already been coded in the DNA of its parent. [/QUOTE][/B] iWILL COME BACK TO this.

Bingo, gene90. Sounds like you got it. I thought the phrasing was vaguely familiar. Damn, I wish someone would come up with some original arguments sometime.

No, I haven't "left," I just had enough time to come here. And I didn't copy and paste anything from my first lengthy post because that would be a little something called "plagerism" which is illegal. So no, I haven't left. I'll never leave. Deal with it. Get over it.And by the way, I'm not done discussing this just yet, so expect me to post more in the future and your insults aren't going to insult me. So go ahead and insult me, but don't expect me to get offended by them.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Conspirator:
No, I haven't "left," I just had enough time to come here. And I didn't copy and paste anything from my first lengthy post because that would be a little something called "plagerism" which is illegal. So no, I haven't left. I'll never leave. Deal with it. Get over it.

​

And by the way, I'm not done discussing this just yet, so expect me to post more in the future and your insults aren't going to insult me. So go ahead and insult me, but don't expect me to get offended by them.

---

Not done discussing what? YOU HAVEN'T STARTED!Also, as far as I can see, no one has insulted you.Mark------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.[This message has been edited by mark24, 08-06-2002]

I haven't started? Then what was the point of my lenghty posts? That at least had something to so with what we're talking about.