|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 60 (9209 total) |
| |
Skylink | |
Total: 919,484 Year: 6,741/9,624 Month: 81/238 Week: 81/22 Day: 22/14 Hour: 0/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: ghosts | |||||||||||||||||||||||
amai Inactive Member |
what do evolutionists make out of ghosts? where did they come from?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1721 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
They don't exist.
Pretty simple explanation, huh?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
amai Inactive Member |
they don't? how about the millions of people who've had an encounter with them? you mean all of them are lying? all of them were hallucinating? ::
i myself don't have any experience with ghosts, but there are so many witnesses. it wouldn't be fair to judge them as "Liars" and such, so i thought that probably they exist.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1721 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
they don't? how about the millions of people who've had an encounter with them? you mean all of them are lying? all of them were hallucinating? Firstly, there's nowhere near a million people who have had encounters with ghosts. Are they lying? Some of them. Are some hallucinating? Sure. Still others wanted to tell a good story. Others saw or heard something they couldn't explain. Others saw nothing but have very active imaginations. Whith as much weirdness as our brains are capable of doing to us, I don't see any reason to believe that so-called "ghosts" are anything more than imagination, coincidence, or outright fabrication.
it wouldn't be fair to judge them as "Liars" Not all of them are. Many are just mistaken. Many people are convinced that Walt Disney has been cryogenically frozen but I don't blame them for being wrong.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Karl Inactive Member |
And if ghosts do exist, what then? Why would you expect a particular evolutionary line on ghosts?
Evolution is about the origin of biodiversity. It is not about supernatural questions like the existence of ghosts, spirits or gods.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
amai Inactive Member |
quote: i bet the number who had encounter with ghosts reached a million. just in one university here in our country(philippines) almost all students had encounter with one. that's no joke.
quote: some of them are lying. that's accepted. some are hallucinating, that's fine. but how come groups of people would have the same hallucination? like the story of Jesus' resurrection. Peter said they saw Jesus, Thomas doubted and said they're imagining things. how can they imagine the same things?
quote: many of the ghost encounters aren't just one-second thing. there are even pictures(ok, maybe most of them are fabricated) and video footages. we don't have like that on aliens, nor on mermaids.
quote: ah, ok. i just thought they have an explanation which traces back to the bigbang theory.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1721 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
but how come groups of people would have the same hallucination? For the same reason that people's reports of alien abductions tend to be the same, or sightings of the Loch Ness Monster - it's such a part of our culture, everybody knows what they're "supposed" to see. In a sense, by absorbing human culture, people "agree" on what their ghost stories will be like beforehand. Let me ask you this - if every single ghost story can be explained by deception, hallucination, equipment malfunction, or plain and simple mistake or gullibility, why assume there's any such thing as ghosts?
we don't have like that on aliens What about that alien autopsy video? Did you know P.T. Barnum had a stuffed mermaid in his show? For what reasons do you reject that evidence that you think don't apply to "evidence" of ghosts?
i just thought they have an explanation which traces back to the bigbang theory. If by that you mean "an explanation commensurate with naturalist philosophy of science", then the explanation is "people see things that simply aren't there, sometimes." Or "some people are way too credulous." There's nothing about the big bang theory itself that has anything at all to do with ghosts. (Or evolution, for that matter.) If ghosts really existed, don't you think somebody would be out there making huge amounts of money on them? They could use the ghost to pass through walls and steal corporate secrets. Governments would employ them as spies. You'd be able to hire them to follow your cheating spouse. Everyone would know there were ghosts because everybody would have access to them. There may be 6 billion people on earth today but the amount of dead people throughout history is astronomically larger. There's easily ten potential ghosts for every person alive today. With those odds, don't you think there should be a lot more ghosts? If the paranormal really existed it would be big business, not the province of corner charlitans.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter Member (Idle past 1733 days) Posts: 2161 From: Cambridgeshire, UK. Joined: |
Just so you don't get me wrong entirely I am not saying
that ghosts definitely do exist. However, without proper investigation we cannot say thatthey do not either. What they are is another matter entirely. There is legitemate research that goes on in supposed hauntedlocations, and they ocasionally turn up some anomalies that cannot be convincingly explained away ... so there is likely 'something' going on in these locales. Perhaps one day, when people stop discounting things out-of-hand,we may have an answer.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
David unfamous Inactive Member |
Do these 'anomalies' ever include transparent human figures walking through walls, or headless horsemen? I'd wager they don't, yet those are the very ghosts that so many people believe in.
Ghosts are either witnessed by millions of people each year - something that could easily be verified with basic video recording equipment - or they are nothing more than stories embelished by those who don't wish to admit they get spooked by creaky floorboards in old houses.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6729 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
One should however, have a healthy fear of the movie Ghost due to the fact that Patrick Swayze is such a crap actor it is frightening...in fact placing Swayze and actor in the same sentence should be punishable by being forced to listen to his music which is at about the same level of other musical thespians such as say...Don Johnson.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter Member (Idle past 1733 days) Posts: 2161 From: Cambridgeshire, UK. Joined: |
quote: Well ... no, but few 'eye-witness' accounts of 'ghosts' describesuch things either. Usually when walking through walls is involved (or above/below ground level) the general description of the sighting corresponds to times when the walls/floors were at different levels/locations. 'Eye-witness' testimony is rarely accepted even in paranormal investigations (anecdotal and all that). I'll stress now ... I'm not saying there are ghosts, what I amsaying is that the phenomena that are reported at supposedly haunted locations have not been sufficiently investigated to rule out ghosts (whatever they may be). One feature of hauntings is unexpected, transient electro-magneticfields, and such fields have been shown to affect people's moods (make them axious, elated, etc.). Maybe ghostly apparitions are just induced hallucinations ... we don't know enough about them to say one way or the other. There are sufficient reports to be curious, and sufficientunexplainable anomalies to warrant further investigation. Comes back to my pet-peeve of ruling something out because itis hard to believe rather than because it has been investigated sufficiently to rule-out certain explanations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 9012 From: Canada Joined: |
Comes back to my pet-peeve of ruling something out because it is hard to believe rather than because it has been investigated sufficiently to rule-out certain explanations It is a matter of allocating resources. There are lots of things to be studied and understood better. However, there are limits to the resources available to do so. So judgement calls are made as to where some research my prove to be fruitful in some way. There has, after all, been research into ghosts. It hasn't been very fruitful. Additional research in psychology tells us something about how easily fooled people are. I have, myself, seen things which were not there.If it was my research career I wounldn't pick that area.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6729 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
Hi Nosy
What is/was the testable or (falsifiable hypothesis for that matter) in studying ghosts?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter Member (Idle past 1733 days) Posts: 2161 From: Cambridgeshire, UK. Joined: |
Saying that such-and-such is of low priority (though
possibly interesting) so we cannot allocate funds to its research is one thing ... and perfectly reasonable in my opinion. What I object to is refusing to consider investigations onthe grounds that 'well that's hardly likely is it.'
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter Member (Idle past 1733 days) Posts: 2161 From: Cambridgeshire, UK. Joined: |
I'd be more interested in studying 'haunted locations'.
There are numerous locations throughout the world, and especiallythe UK, where over the last 100-150 years people have reported unusual encounters/feelings/sightings etc. The majority of these defy natural explanation, and 'psychological' factors accounted for, there appears to be 'something' occurring in these locations. I would like to know what. Many ghostly apparitions have been reported in the same sitesover a number of years by independent observers (some from ifferent locations on the same occurrance). The reports have far more correlations than one would expect by 'being spooked by a sudden noise'. It is not sufficient to prove anything, but seems to me adequategrounds for considering further investigation. Part of that investigation must include how likely it is for theobservers to have heard the tales or be aware of the 'haunting'. I'm not suggesting that 'ghosts' are the spirits of the departed,but that 'huanted locations' exhibit phenomena that we do not as yet understand ... but that might be useful for us to understand.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024