Review and Confirm The Mathematical Proof of God

Could you explain "how numbers work but also why," and then explain how that ties in to mathematically proving God?--Percy

Could you please present your proof in the thread? See dBCode Help for how to use the codes to include images and quote text. For example, if you enter this: Then you'll get this (400 is the width you want): --Percy

Your belief doesn't change what is true.There is no unification of math and the Word of God. There is no proof of God, no proof of a universe constructed with intent that math be ingrained, no revealed truth of any ingrained nature nor of a Trinity, and no evidence that the Bible is anything but the words of men. Conflating the evolution of homo sapiens with the solar system and the number 9 is just numerology.There is no Trinity of numbers in Revelation 13:18, nor anything about the cross and a time clock in Romans 5:6.Someday you will understand that it isn't what you yourself have become convinced is true, but what you can convincingly demonstrate is true to others. It is clear that you sincerely believe you have happened across a deep truth (you are not alone in your specific beliefs - many very similar numerological claims litter the Internet, but you probably already know that - the only thing original on your webpages is the images - the same numerological claims can be found at many websites), but it is clear to everyone else that you have fallen into the very common trap of thinking that certain numerical coincidences have religious meaning.--Percy

I think he meant each hand was pierced separately and the two feet were pierced as one for a total of three. I wonder if being pierced in the side counts.--Percy

I looked into this earlier, and the two websites I found with the same images seem to also be from KING IYK. Maybe you found a different one?But his numerology is definitely not original. The same numerological arguments can be found all over the Internet.--Percy

Again, it isn't what you personally believe is true that matters, but what you can demonstrate to others is true. Clearly your arguments are gaining no traction, so you must look deeper into your numerological evidence and find ways to demonstrate that is more than merely the coincidence of the same numbers popping up in different contexts.You might want to look into the history of numerology being used to prove things. It isn't pretty.--Percy

It is you who does not tell the truth. Here's a list of the first few results from a search for "the magnificence of 3 6 9: the trinity of numbers":

• 3-6-9 CODE REVEALED
  
• The magnificence of 3,6,9 | Vortex Mathematics (Key to Universe?)
  
• Tesla’s 3-6-9 and Vortex Math: Is this really the key to the universe?
  
• Why Tesla Called “3, 6 and 9” the Secret of the Universe
  
• TESLA 3 6 9 WITH RELIGION
  
• the divine code 3,6,9 is the most powerful in the universe
  
• If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have the key to the universe. - Nikola Tesla
  
• What did Nikola Tesla mean when he said, "If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have the key to the universe"?
  
• If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9
  
• The numbers 3, 6, and 9 hold profound significance in both mathematics and spiritual traditions

If you hope to persuade anyone you're going to have to present convincing evidence. Numerology can pretty much be dismissed right out of the gate.--Percy

Yes, exactly, your work is not original. Is that what you're seeking, recognition via gratitude? How do you imagine you will achieve that when most here think you're obtusely preaching nonsense?By the way, about this image: It chops off the entire bottom half of the cross along with Christ's body. If you superimpose the full cross down to the feet on a clockface, the crossbar does not intersect at 3 and 9 but at 2 and 10, as here: I haven't seen your error repeated anywhere else, though naturally I can't look everywhere, but it seems quite possible that your error is original with you.You may thank me now.--Percy

I don't think you're listening. Discussion is a two way street, not a monologue. You're repeating the same thing over and over, no matter whether it makes any sense or what feedback is given you.Maybe we should talk about something else. Can you tell us a little about yourself? What part of the world are you from? What branch of Christianity? What kind of work do you do or are you still in school?--Percy

Nonsense said twice is still nonsense.--Percy

This self-immolation reminds me of when I pulled this off against a cocky 1700 (he knew I was unrated) at the 1968 National High School at the McAlpin Hotel in New York City. I only know American notation, sorry, gave up chess before the switch to algebraic notation: Black should have resigned immediately but pushed on until move 17. I didn't come up with this on the spot. I'd seen it in one of Fred Reinfeld's books.--Percy

The & was part of the English alphabet from around 1835 until near the end of the 1800's. During that period there were only 8 planets. Pluto wasn't discovered until 1930, making 9 planets, but then the discovery of Eris (more massive than Pluto) forced refinements in the definition of what a planet was, returning the number of planets to 8. But there's a possibility of another planet out beyond Pluto, and if one is discovered then that would return the number of planets to 9, except that if in your view Pluto is a planet then there would be 10.This is just another way of telling you what you've been told many times already in this thread, that these numbers are human constructs and are impermanent. If there is a celestial plane, these human-made numbers are not part of it.--Percy

Good point. But the New Testament was originally written in Greek, which has 24 letters, nicely divisible by 3, but the result is 8, which isn't one of KING IYK's magic numbers. Maybe the Greek alphabet had a different number of letters back then? KING?--Percy

Tangle said nothing of the kind. The only one claiming God has chosen a particular language in which to reveal his Truth, and that it is English, is you, just one of the many claims that either you've been unable to support or that makes no sense.Maybe you should switch to Spanish. It actually does have 27 letters (the extra letter is ñ).--Percy

To quote text from another message you can use either the [qs] or [quote] dBCode.If you type this: Then it will look like this: And if you type this: Then it will look like this:

quote:

---

This is the quoted text.

---

--Percy