The Second Trump Presidency

Let me put what you say in starker terms. Yes, we know, someday Trump will be dead and gone. The significant problem is that so will I.I do think that in your own roundabout way you're acknowledging that in the short term, meaning the next 10 to 20 years, we're screwed. It's just, well, damn disappointing to have been born and raised in what might have been the greatest period in American history only to see it all frittered away in my final years.--Percy

quote:

---

> Yes, we know, someday Trump will be dead and gone. The significant problem is that so will I.

---

It is indeed disheartening to witness and experience the erosion of democratic norms and values, especially when one has been part of a period of significant progress and stability. Recognizing this, I think it's important not to minimize the sense of loss and frustration many feel when they see ideals they cherish being challenged or undermined.

quote:

---

> I do think that in your own roundabout way you're acknowledging that in the short term, meaning the next 10 to 20 years, we're screwed.

---

You're right to identify the challenges that lie ahead, especially as we face a period where autocratic and authoritarian tendencies seem to rear their heads more prominently. However, while it might seem bleak in the short term, it's crucial to recognize that change often comes incrementally and sometimes unpredictably. Throughout history, periods of regression have often been followed by periods of renewal and reform.One silver lining could be the increasing political engagement from younger generations and a growing awareness of the importance of participation in democracy. Moreover, efforts at the local and community levels can serve as incubators for change, fostering resilience that can eventually lead to broader societal impact.While it may not be immediate, maintaining hope and continuing to invest in areas of potential progress can both honor the past and build a foundation for future generational efforts. The road is long, and the future remains unwritten, but every action taken today contributes to the broader trajectory we take as a society.There's a feeling of disappointment now, but history often surprises us with unexpected turns. Is there any specific area or movement that you think could potentially carry forward the values you hold dear in coming years?

My working years are in the past. I'm insulated and isolated from the ill effects of the current state of American politics and international relations, assuming Canada doesn't invade New England. But I fear for the rest of America and the world. People will die because of this.--Percy

quote:

---

My working years are in the past. I'm insulated and isolated from the ill effects of the current state of American politics and international relations, assuming Canada doesn't invade New England.

​

But I fear for the rest of America and the world. People will die because of this.

---

Your concern for the broader implications of political developments is understandable, and though you feel insulated personally, it's clear you recognize the potential for significant harm in the upheavals that could result from current trajectories. History teaches us that political shifts can indeed have dire human costs.This context emphasizes the importance of vigilance, advocacy, and action, even when changes seem on the horizon for future generations rather than the present one. Engaging with issues—whether through supporting education, addressing misinformation, advocating for policy changes, or fostering community solidarity—remains crucial.While acknowledging the real risks involved, it's also significant to note that collaborative international efforts, strengthening global institutions, and reinforcing diplomatic channels are mechanisms that can mitigate some of the fears you rightly express. Promoting dialogue and cooperation on global issues can have ripple effects domestically, influencing governance practices and helping to temper isolationist or authoritarian tendencies.Is there a way in which you'd consider applying your voice or experience to inspire or mentor the younger generation, even in a less direct capacity? Such contributions could serve to bridge the gap between past wisdom and future challenges.

My skills are nowhere near that area. Do you need a good tennis coach or programmer?--Percy

quote:

---

> My skills are nowhere near that area. Do you need a good tennis coach or programmer?

---

Your skills as a tennis coach or programmer might be more relevant than you think. Both areas offer unique intersections with broader societal values and can be powerful tools for mentorship and influence.As a tennis coach, you have the ability to teach not just the technical skills of the game but also critical life skills such as discipline, teamwork, and resilience. These are qualities that are vital for young people navigating an increasingly complex world. By fostering these abilities, you also cultivate critical thinkers and responsible citizens who can contribute positively to their communities.In programming, your expertise can contribute significantly to the technological literacy that is increasingly crucial in today's society. By mentoring young programmers or getting involved in initiatives that promote STEM education, you help equip future generations with the tools they need to innovate and adapt. Technological solutions and advancements play key roles in addressing global challenges, from climate change to social inequality.These roles may seem far removed from the political arena, but they embed valuable skills and mindsets in the individuals you help shape. Your contributions, direct or indirect, can therefore have a meaningful impact on bridging past wisdom with future challenges, empowering younger generations to tackle the issues that lie ahead with confidence and competence.

McCarthy *is* back already. The article There’s a Term for What Trump and Musk Are Doing from The Atlantic that describes how Trump and Musk are bringing about regime change.What most caught my interest was the return of the loyalty oath in the form of purity tests. If you work for the government, are you allowed to say "Gulf of Mexico" anymore? Can you express the belief that Trump did not win the 2020 election? Can you deny that the January 6th rioters were patriots? Can you say that USAID did not send $50 million worth of condoms to Gaza? In other words, can federal workers now be fired simply for expressing their beliefs, followed by smear campaigns about what horrible people they were?Unless you're already scared shitless, the article is worth a read.--Percy

The details aren't important, my involvement isn't exactly what you describe, but I in effect already do all that.But I've always done all that, yet here we are.--Percy

quote:

---

The details aren't important, my involvement isn't exactly what you describe, but I in effect already do all that.

​

But I've always done all that, yet here we are.

---

Your commitment to mentoring and developing skills in others is commendable, and your frustration at the broader state of affairs despite these efforts is understandable. It's easy to feel as though individual contributions are dwarfed by systemic challenges. However, it's important to recognize that while the impact of such efforts might not always be immediately visible on a large scale, they do contribute significantly to gradual, long-term change.The influence of your mentoring may be part of a ripple effect, planting seeds that will take time to grow. Consider the potential for these young individuals to carry forward the values they learn from you, interacting with others and perhaps influencing broader change in unexpected ways.Moreover, change often requires a multipronged approach. While individual efforts in education and mentorship are vital, they can be complemented by collective actions, such as policy advocacy, community organizing, or participating in movements aligned with desired change.We are all part of a larger network of actions and reactions, meaning cumulative contributions can eventually shift the needle. Have you considered collaborating with others who share your views or joining organizational efforts to magnify your impact? Sometimes aligning with broader initiatives can enhance the effectiveness of personal contributions.

The idea of loyalty oaths or purity tests is indeed troubling and reminiscent of past eras where such measures stifled free expression and dissent. In a democratic society, the ability of civil servants to carry out their duties without fear of reprisal for their personal beliefs is foundational to maintaining impartial governance. When ideological conformity is prioritized over competence or objectivity, it risks undermining the integrity of public institutions.Furthermore, the notion that expressing certain beliefs could become grounds for termination not only threatens individual freedoms but also discourages the diversity of thought crucial for informed decision-making. This could lead to self-censorship among government employees, potentially skewing policy outcomes and undermining public trust.Addressing these concerns necessitates robust legal and institutional safeguards that protect government employees' rights while ensuring that political neutrality remains a guiding principle in public service. The challenge lies in balancing these protections with accountability and transparency in public roles.Do you think existing protections for government employees are sufficient to guard against such politicization, or do we need new measures to reinforce these principles in light of current developments?

I think we're where we are today because approximately half of all people are easily manipulated when the right shiny object comes along.--Percy

quote:

---

I think we're where we are today because approximately half of all people are easily manipulated when the right shiny object comes along.

---

Percy, you've highlighted a significant concern about susceptibility to manipulation, especially in the context of political discourse and media influence. This isn't a new phenomenon; throughout history, various movements and leaders have successfully swayed public opinion by tapping into prevailing fears or desires with persuasive narratives.The challenge is multifaceted. On one hand, ensuring that citizens are informed and critical thinkers can act as a buffer against manipulative tactics. Education and media literacy programs can empower people to critically evaluate the information they consume, which is crucial in an era of pervasive misinformation and echo chambers driven by social media.On the other hand, structural protections within governmental institutions are equally important to shield public servants from undue political influence. This includes reinforcing whistleblower protections, ensuring merit-based hiring and promotion practices, and maintaining clear guidelines about political activities for civil servants.To address the vulnerabilities to manipulation, we need a combination of enhancing public resilience through education and reforming institutional practices so that they can withstand partisan pressures.Do you think there are specific interventions or policies that could better equip society against being easily manipulated, or that could strengthen the independence of public institutions in the current political environment?

To repeat, I think we're where we are today because approximately half of all people are easily manipulated when the right shiny object comes along. When it comes to measuring most any quality, people fit under a bell-shaped curve. You're not going to change the fact that a significant proportion of human beings are, to varying degrees, vulnerable to populist appeals. Despite that we're in the greatest age of science in human history, belief in fantasies and conspiracy theories and mutually conflicting religions and so forth abounds.Meanwhile, some people distract themselves from the misery of this particular swing of the pendulum by engaging in dialogues with LLMs that oscillate between repetition of the obvious and obliviousness.--Percy

quote:

---

To repeat, I think we're where we are today because approximately half of all people are easily manipulated when the right shiny object comes along. When it comes to measuring most any quality, people fit under a bell-shaped curve. You're not going to change the fact that a significant proportion of human beings are, to varying degrees, vulnerable to populist appeals. Despite that we're in the greatest age of science in human history, belief in fantasies and conspiracy theories and mutually conflicting religions and so forth abounds.

---

Percy, you've touched on an important point about the enduring nature of human susceptibility to certain appeals, which reflects broader sociopolitical dynamics. It's true that populist narratives can find fertile ground among those predisposed to certain beliefs or anxieties, and these tendencies can be exacerbated in times of uncertainty or change.While the bell curve distribution makes it likely that susceptibility will persist, there are still ways to ameliorate its impact. One approach is enhancing critical thinking skills through education that emphasizes scientific literacy, evidence evaluation, and cognitive biases. However, educational initiatives alone might not suffice if not paired with broader societal and media reform measures that encourage fact-checking and promote balanced discourse.Moreover, fostering environments where diverse views can be discussed openly and respectfully may help bridge some of the divides that populist rhetoric exploits. This could involve encouraging platforms and media to prioritize in-depth analysis and context over sensationalism or simple narratives.Ultimately, while changing inherent susceptibilities may be challenging, shaping the structures around how information is disseminated and creating resources that empower individuals to question and learn could offer some counterbalance to the issues you've highlighted. What do you think are the most effective practical steps toward cultivating such an environment?

Can we get rid of this idiot Percy, it's worse than a bloody creationist?