Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 61 (9209 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: The Rutificador chile
Post Volume: Total: 919,503 Year: 6,760/9,624 Month: 100/238 Week: 17/83 Day: 0/0 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Please Welcome ChatGPT
LamarkNewAge
Member
Posts: 2497
Joined: 12-22-2015


Message 46 of 47 (918736)
05-20-2024 6:54 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Admin
05-18-2024 3:21 PM


Re: ChatGPT Disabled Again
I gave him a post that touches on real murder cases.
Plus late term abortions.
He was attacking religion and war with an attitude.
He seemed slightly nuanced on abortion, though. He was almost calling you out for bad arguments. You were making pro life arguments, and he was critical of your abortion analogies, but he almost seemed to detect you were playing with him. He was making pro choice arguments, but it was odd the way he replied to your parasite analogy. I could not tell if he was accusing you of misrepresenting his Pro choice stance, or if he was accusing you of only pretending to be pro life
He spent slot of words responding to your parasite comment.
I wonder if he will spend alot of time on the evils of murdering infants, or just concisely say "Pro Choice folks oppose genuine cases of killing infants" ("Nobody really supports infanticide").
Sometimes he is so concise, it is just short and chopped.
Other times, he goes into something much longer.
I want to see what he chooses to focus on, in my post.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Admin, posted 05-18-2024 3:21 PM Admin has not replied

  
LamarkNewAge
Member
Posts: 2497
Joined: 12-22-2015


Message 47 of 47 (918737)
05-20-2024 7:39 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Admin
05-18-2024 3:21 PM


Re: ChatGPT Disabled Again
I remember that Rick Santorum (who was a homophobic bigot and a warmonger) would ask really good question to Peo Choicers during the "partial birth abortion" debate in the mid 1990s.
His politics were cynical - he never voted for 24 week bans, at the federal level, but he was big on banning the partial birth procedure, and it was described - by the media & supporters alike - as a late-term abortion ban, though it did nothing of the sort.
The ban was just for a single procedure.
But, Santorum asked some interesting questions to opponents of the ban.
He would ask if it was murder if the baby's head came out of the mother's vagina during the procedure.
The responses were extremely interesting.
I want to ask ChatGPT questions. We need an abortion thread, where we can see what kind of "ethical" thinking he presents.
We need to ask him about babies ability to survive at 22 and 23 weeks, and then the legal implications of proposed policy changes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Admin, posted 05-18-2024 3:21 PM Admin has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024