Phat writes:
Apparently, DeepSeek was developed at a fraction of the cost of ChatGPT and, though using lower-quality software, impressed enough people to shake the market.
[With the standard caveat that I am not a software expert]
I think that's a bit misleading. DeepSeek was trained by all of the massive AIs that cost so much. If those big, expensive AIs didn't exist then neither would DeepSeek. DeepSeek is essentially the student and the big AIs are its teachers. This also means DeepSeek isn't as accurate as those other AIs, not to mention all of the issues that will be inherited by DeepSeek. It is a perfect example of the overall Chinese industrial strategy which is to copy intellectual property from the west and make stuff with it.
At the same time, DeepSeek is good at what it does. It's light and pretty accurate. However, you still need those big AIs in order to teach these smaller and stripped down AIs.