You are unlikely to get that.
I'll give my personal comments. Others may have different points of disagreement.
1. Evolution and Origin of life are to separate things. There could have been origin of life without evolution. Or life might have always existed in some form. It is generally agreed that origin of life has not been explained.
2. Again, this is too simplistic. We do not have a good definition of what we mean by "life".
It is conceivable that it all started with some chemical reactions that we would not consider to be life, but might have been a precursor to life. Precursors to life could have originated multiple times, and what see as life today could result from several different precursors.
3. We don't have a good definition of "more complex".
4. It isn't clear what "inferior" means here. Whether a mutation is beneficial depends on the environment. A succession of changes in the environment may have been an important driver of evolution.
5. Again, we have a difficulty with "complex". And we have a difficulty with "highest life form". It is not clear what those terms would mean.
6. Hooray -- I can agree with this one.
Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity