Is ID falsifiable by any kind of experiment?

I just do not buy the stupidity of Evolution for I do not want to be intellectually stupid.Reality is with us, let us talk reality in Biology and in biological world, and see who wins.

Religious explanation like Evolution cannot win in science. Reality will prevent it. Now, Evolution has already a counter theory that will surely blow Evolution to pieces, it is called Biological Interrelation, BiTs.

I knew how Evolution works, that is why I knew how to criticize and replace Evolution. It is you, Darwin and all supporters of Evolution that have no clue on reality and in biological living world. You are good in Evolution, but not good on reality, that is one kinds of stupidity in science.

Interrelate is the new explanation in Biology, for change of/in frequency alleles and the origin of species. It is called Biological Interrelation, BiTs.
​ I knew Evolution and its claim as you had stated, but I do not even care since I always relied on reality, not on someone's invention of reality like Evolution. Again, there are changes in population, inside the population, but they do not evolve to some form of new species. They all just interrelate to protect their lives. Again, what you are witnessing and seeing in both black and white rats are not evolution, but simply interrelation at works, to save their lives. rats will never become another new species, they will always stay as rats.That is why, Evolution is an stupid idea and stupid explanation in science. We need to replace Evolution with Interrelation.

I can support the Intelligent Design, in fact, I have science book to support my claim.https://www.amazon.com/...ign-ebook/dp/B0BHJ2BKF7/ref=sr_1_1

I do not hate Evolution, since I do not hate religions. But I hate a supposedly scientific explanations like Evolution and yet has no basis in science. I hate unscientific claims in science like Evolution. If you claim and agree that Evolution is your religion, then, I do not hate Evolution.Oh my goodness.. I did not say that the 7 Repair mechanisms of cell govern the cell. They probably do. I said that cell has 7 Repair Mechanisms, and if you could Google that, you can know them. It is so easy. You like Biology and yet you do not know that? Oh my...I am not asking you to buy my books, since probably, you are financially poorer than me, but, I assure you, you will never know intelligence correctly without knowing my discoveries of it. That is for sure.

I do not even hate Evolution, if that is your religion. But I hate stupidity in science because I hate stupidity in science, for I cannot test nor falsify stupidity in science, like Evolution.

I knew too that since cell and its members have many Repair mechanisms, then, they are the evidences that the cell is intellen, or intelligently designed, showing further that Evolution is really stupid.There are only two possibilities: that I am wrong or they are. I think they are, since they could never define intelligence and use that in Biology. Showing further that those who supports Evolution are intellectually dumb. Dumb, because they did not know the topic of intelligence.That is why, I think that Evolution is a religion.. since how could a 160 years old theory could never define intelligence or instinct... stupid Evolution, right?

I understand Evolution, I understand science, I understand reality. You, you did not understand both science and reality.

I will repeat that I do not care about the stupid explanations of Evolution about mutation or natural selections, since they are all wrong anyway. WHY WRONG? Because Darwin did not have criteria between control to un-control change in frequency alleles. That is stupidity.I did not say frequency alleles, I said change in freq alleles, and I do not care. Evolution is wrong anyway.Interrelation, from Biological Interrelation uses intelligence to deal with life and living organisms.
The main mechanism is Intelligent Selection, and not Natural Selection. Nature does not select.

You forgot that Evolution is wrong because Evolution has no basis of its explanations in science. WHAT BASIS? The basis of change.Evolution must have criteria or basis of change, if not, Evolution is wrong and dumb.WHERE is that basis? None! Thus, Evolution is a religion.

Evolution is religion since it has no answer for two opposing extremes opposites in Biology. Creationism was kicked out in science since Creationism cannot tell which is created X and un-created X. The same with Evolution, Evolution must be kicked out in science.The FIRST breakthrough is the definition of intelligence, that all definitions, as written in all dictionaries, in all formats, in all languages, must be changed and replaced. The correct one is from my discovered definition.TEST for what change? There are many changes in biological world, and if you are asking the transitional change to become new species, then, Evolution must answer that first. I had just submitted that falsification paper in science journals for that, since Evolution has no test for that.Care to answer, or give up?

DEFEAT me first in science, then, I will agree with you.Amazon.com

I would like to reiterate that Evolution has no part in reality in Biology. Evolution does not explain reality but invented its own reality, and imposed it in science. One examples of Evolution's fantasy of explanation is Natural Selection. No one had ever tested and confirmed that nature could select for life. There is no evidence for this.Yes, in all published dictionaries, publishers must invent definitions for every words so that they could publish the dictionaries, like the word intelligence or intentional, etc, by using Evolution as basis. But when you use them in science, for example in the change in frequency alleles, (CIFA) you cannot simply use them.Thus, there is something wrong with the basis, Evolution. That is why Evolution is a stupid theory, for Evolution never answer anything in science.

Spontaneous = natural process.Once again, anybody can claim in science. Even religious freaks could claim many things in science.
But science needs to know if X is really made through spontaneous process or not.Can you tell me which X in Biology that is not "made by spontaneous process" (MBSP) and MBSP X?What is the criteria and numerical limit betweenMBSP X = _______________?
not MBSP X = _____________?How did you arrive or derive the criteria for MBSP? Any experiment? Any test so that I could confirm too?