Does reversing abortion laws give all non-white Americans a better socio-economic dem

What has that got to do with Emancipation Day?

You didn't "show" anything. You had claimed that Canada didn't have slavery andI pointed out that you were dead wrong.

As I have pointed out before, you misunderstand what "fittest" means.How are those of us who are NOT the "fittest" capable of deciding who the "fittest" are? Historically, the Hitlers, etc. choose THEMSELVES as the "fittest".

It's a poor teacher who blames the student.

quote

---

"If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself."
-- attributed to Albert Einstein

---

So try again. In Message 113 I said, "How are those of us who are NOT the "fittest" capable of deciding who the "fittest" are?"Answer the question as if you were an intelligent human being.

I keep telling you you're misunderstanding the word "fittest". "Survival of the fittest" is not measured by our contrived tests. If we select the one that wins our test, that's artificial selection. If we set the fitness parameters - e.g. whitest - that has nothing to do with fitness for survival. (Unless you're going to kill off the ones that don't fit your parameters.)

Edited by ringo, : Spellinge.

I know. That's why I said "attributed to". A similar quote is attributed to Richard Feynman, though he supposedly said, "eight-year-old."Apparently, Einstein actually said something like the opposite - that you can't be expected to explain physics to a six-year-old.But I think the supposed quote has validity in the context of Greatest I am calling me a "retarded child".

You said, "We test and select our fittest in many areas by competition." Message 121How is it not whites who select their idea of the "fittest"?And note that you also said "our" fittest, suggesting that "we" select only from the whites. So stupidity is being selected out by natural selection.

You said that "we" select "our" fittest for positions of power in business and politics. Message 92That doesn't sound like a running race to me. It sounds like white people choosing white people. They didn't change the laws because of numbers. They changed the laws because of doctrinaire politics.

You want to be a racist and a non-racist at the same time.

I agree that we are all racist but it is NOT something to be proud of. Racism may have been "productive" in the days when small groups were competing for limited resources but it is counter-productive in a global context. How does lynching black people reflect love for self? See above. What is the Ku Klux Klan protecting?

It's easy to see what's wrong with "the other side". It's hard to see past the beam in your own eye.

And in that thread you consistently refused to explicate your understanding of Ellis Potter.

Correct. A criminal without a crime has no purpose. Good. I personally have little use for competitions. Cooperation is preferable. Including society, which has evolved far beyond your dog-eat-dog conception of "fellowship". But we don't. We hate the ones who want to rule the world. We stamp them out.

I did quote you. Message 150

No thanks.This is just your standard way of running away from an argument. Say something substaniail.