GIa writes:
oday, are we not mostly giving our best and brightest the top positions in business, sports, politics, etc.
There's no central authority with the power of "giving our best and brightest the top positions," but you seemed to be advocating for one, hence the eugenics connection.
It is obvious what he is advocating:
Fascism. Placing "our best and brightest" into the "top positions in business, sports, politics, etc." to rule over the rest who, by not being the "best and brightest", are clearly
inferior.
Eugenics is based on the perversion and misinterpretation of evolutionary ideas such as
fitness. That perversion formed the basis of
Social Darwinism in which they used (and still do, apparently) their misinterpretations to justify their horrific economic, social, and political practices. Eugenics is just one of those practices which developed in the USA, but it took a Hitler to weaponize it.
That
article on Fascism should be required reading, since our collective memories are sorely in need of refreshing. Even just by browsing through that article, what we hear from the GOP every day and what their stated and implied goals are just keep jumping out at us from the monitor screen. As well as GIa's OP (
Message 1).
For example, from the section,
-- while not trying to copy the article's formatting, I added bolding for emphasis. Pay especial attention to the last paragraph I quote:
quote
Mussolini perceived women's primary role as primarily child bearers, while that of men as warriors, once saying: "War is to man what maternity is to the woman." In an effort to increase birthrates, the Italian Fascist government gave financial incentives to women who raised large families and initiated policies intended to reduce the number of women employed. Italian Fascism called for women to be honoured as "reproducers of the nation" and the Italian Fascist government held ritual ceremonies to honour women's role within the Italian nation. In 1934, Mussolini declared that employment of women was a "major aspect of the thorny problem of unemployment" and that for women, working was "incompatible with childbearing"; Mussolini went on to say that the solution to unemployment for men was the "exodus of women from the work force."
The German Nazi government strongly encouraged women to stay at home to bear children and keep house. This policy was reinforced by bestowing the Cross of Honor of the German Mother on women bearing four or more children. The unemployment rate was cut substantially, mostly through arms production and sending women home so that men could take their jobs. Nazi propaganda sometimes promoted premarital and extramarital sexual relations, unwed motherhood and divorce, but at other times the Nazis opposed such behaviour.
The Nazis decriminalized abortion in cases where fetuses had hereditary defects or were of a race the government disapproved of, while the abortion of healthy pure German, Aryan fetuses remained strictly forbidden. For non-Aryans, abortion was often compulsory. Their eugenics program also stemmed from the "progressive biomedical model" of Weimar Germany. In 1935, Nazi Germany expanded the legality of abortion by amending its eugenics law, to promote abortion for women with hereditary disorders. The law allowed abortion if a woman gave her permission and the fetus was not yet viable and for purposes of so-called racial hygiene.
There is one particular hospital scene set in Nazi Germany which keeps coming up. It's just part of the normal flow of the scene and hardly noticeable ... until you start to question why it keeps coming up. I first saw it in USA TV movies, but then I've also been seeing it in German productions set in the Hitlerzeit. The maternity nurse presents the newborn for the first time to its mother
and the very first thing she does is to show the mother the baby's hands and feet to confirm ten fingers and ten toes. It wouldn't mean anything if it just appeared in one production,
but in so many independent productions in different countries? What makes it a
Leitmotif, a thematic thread that runs through all these productions? If it's just a custom in German maternity wards, then we could expect it in German productions,
but why would it also appear in so many American productions as well?
The reason is the Nazi Eugenics laws. Any sign of a genetic abnormality would require that that baby become a "ward of the state" for "special care and treatment" -- do I need to paint a picture?
Now looking back at the OP (
Message 1):
GIa writes:
Does reversing abortion laws give all non-white Americans a better socio-economic demographic position?
Statistically, more non-whites are aborted than whites.
Reverse this trend and the shrinking white demographic dominance goes into overdrive.
White is demographically shooting itself in the foot.
White power, at this point in time, is being quite generous to non-whites.
One might see it all as a huge white restitution and reparations to all those non-whites we white predators stressed.
Are white Americans who are on the right, aware of what they are giving up, demographically speaking?
Should the non-white Americans be on the right wing side on this, just for the benefits of fast tracking their control?
This is the same reasoning behind Nazi laws and policies regarding abortion: abortion (sometimes even compulsory) for non-Aryans, but forbidden for Aryans. Diminish the size of the non-Aryan population while increasing the size of the Aryan population.
We have found tht US White supremacist domestic terrorists (eg, Timothy McFey) have a Bible:
The Turner Diaries:
quote
The Turner Diaries is a 1978 novel by William Luther Pierce, published under the pseudonym Andrew Macdonald. It depicts a violent revolution in the United States which leads to the overthrow of the federal government, a nuclear war, and, ultimately, a race war which leads to the systematic extermination of non-whites. All groups opposed by the novel's protagonist, Earl Turner—including Jews, non-whites, "liberal actors", and politicians—are exterminated.
The Turner Diaries was described as being "explicitly racist and anti-Semitic" by The New York Times and has been labeled the "bible of the racist right" by the FBI. The book was greatly influential in shaping white nationalism and the later development of the white genocide conspiracy theory. It has also inspired numerous hate crimes and acts of terrorism, including the 1984 assassination of Alan Berg, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, and the 1999 London nail bombings and Columbine High School massacre.
Malcolm Nance, retired intelligence professional who has spent a lot of time monitoring those extremicists' social media channels, discussed their plan as inspired by that book.
This is the video of part of an interview where he discusses it (it refuses to be imbedded here):
Malcolm Nance is Back Stateside!!
That video does not show the entire interview, but I had listened to it on the radio. In addition to the plan to kill all non-whites (and Democrats) they can find, they also have a plan to organize ethnically pure white men into rape gangs to find and rape ethnically-pure white women in order to produce more ethnically-pure white babies.
I ain't shittin' you!
Is that supposed to be part of GIa's ideas for rule by the "strongest and the best"?
Fascism?
Well
fuck that shit!
quote
The Magic Christian, Peter Sellers' and Ringo's characters are in the theater for a performance of Hamlet:
Hamlet: To be or not to be ...
Ringo: (getting up to leave) I've seen it.
We've also all seen Fascism already. It's an oldie but a baddie.
We do not need to see it again!Edited by dwise1, : corrected small typo
™ Version 4.2
