Not sure what insight he thinks he is giving us that isn't already well understood or discussed in the already existing literature.
He is just bragging about what he perceives as his own brilliance. It's the same when he talks about "the mathematics of evolution". It's his debate style. He avoids detailed discussion about his assumptions by always changing the subject and bragging.
I guess that his way of hiding his own ignorance.
Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity