|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The War in Europe | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18647 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.3 |
I see that two of you replied negatively. We can't win the war in Ukraine. Putin will take it to the nuclear brink. NATO cannot "win". And what does WIN mean anyway? A One-World government eventually? The UN would never have any say here...any more than they do in Israel.
When both religious and non-religious people reach the same conclusions then you know religion isn't the reason.--Percy God alone is God *but* God is not alone~Ellis Potter We see Monsters where Science shows us Windmills.~Phat, remixed Critics would of course say that "God" is a product of human imagination...but then again God may well declare that all of creation is a product of His imagination! Its all in perspective of the the observer.~Phat
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17916 Joined: Member Rating: 6.7
|
quote: That’s pretty obvious. Russian troops out of Ukraine and back to the pre-invasion borders - and ideally Russia out of Crimea, too. Longer term a contained Russia that isn’t going to invade Poland or the Baltic states or Finland or…
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22945 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 6.9 |
Phat writes in Message 1156: I see that two of you replied negatively. You received a couple down votes, for good reason. It's hard to even characterize what you said - maybe "not even wrong" best does it. That's why there have been no replies. I wasn't going to reply either, but I'll reply now with some feedback, not that that's ever helped in the past.
We can't win the war in Ukraine. Putin will take it to the nuclear brink. NATO cannot "win". "We can win the war in Ukraine. Putin won't take it to the nuclear brink. NATO can "win"." That offers just as much substance as you. Now what? Could I suggest something other than one unsupported assertion after another?
And what does WIN mean anyway? It means insuring Ukraine remains independent from Russia, as opposed to becoming a Russian puppet state and a stepping stone for expansion of the totalitarian Russian state.
A One-World government eventually? The UN would never have any say here...any more than they do in Israel. No one here ever mentions one world government except you - why do you keep bringing it up as though it casts doubt on anything anyone here is saying? Many of the things you say come out of the blue, and I strongly suspect you're just typing away in one window while watching YouTube videos in another. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DrJones* Member Posts: 2339 From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 7.6 |
And what does WIN mean anyway? Russia fucks off out of ukraine.
A One-World government eventually
take off the tin foil hat.It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds soon I discovered that this rock thing was true Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world And so there was only one thing I could do Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On *not an actual doctor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minnemooseus Member Posts: 3971 From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior) Joined: Member Rating: 7.1
|
And what does WIN mean anyway? Russia fucks off out of ukraine. Ukraine is going to lose the war, the question is how badly? A total loss would be Russia entirely taking over Ukraine. A lesser loss would be for Russia to withdraw from Ukraine, maybe even withdraw from Crimea. That still leave Ukraine as a terrible mess of lost life and destruction. Did (North) Vietnam win the war against the U.S.? No, they just suffered a lesser loss. Moose
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22945 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 6.9
|
Minnemooseus writes in Message 1160: Ukraine is going to lose the war, the question is how badly? A total loss would be Russia entirely taking over Ukraine. A lesser loss would be for Russia to withdraw from Ukraine, maybe even withdraw from Crimea. That still leave Ukraine as a terrible mess of lost life and destruction. I get your point about the death and destruction Russia has wreaked upon Ukraine, but if a Russian withdrawal from Ukraine and even possibly Crimea that meant the end of the war isn't a victory then victory doesn't exist. To my mind it would be a tremendous victory. But it would also be the beginning of solving the problem of how to better insure Ukrainian security in the future, and of how to further isolate Russia in a way that lessens the threat to western Europe. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18647 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.3 |
In brief, I see the problem this way. It starts with one man who is purportedly the world's wealthiest Oligarch. That man is Vladimir Putin. According to the article, several nations have been mentioned as Oligarchies.
quote:Ukraine was also mentioned, as was Iran. Comments? As for China, I did a bit of research since I was not up to speed on their system of government. Understanding the Black Box of Chinese Politics This article broke down the Chinese system of government and showcased how Chairman Xi has consolidated power. China is not mentioned so much as an Oligarchy, however. The CCP has 90 million official members governing a nation of a billion people. There seems to be a trend towards concentration of wealth and power in the hands of fewer and fewer people.When both religious and non-religious people reach the same conclusions then you know religion isn't the reason.--Percy God alone is God *but* God is not alone~Ellis Potter We see Monsters where Science shows us Windmills.~Phat, remixed Critics would of course say that "God" is a product of human imagination...but then again God may well declare that all of creation is a product of His imagination! Its all in perspective of the the observer.~Phat
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9580 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 6.6
|
Phat writes: There seems to be a trend towards concentration of wealth and power in the hands of fewer and fewer people. It's not a trend, it's a trait and it's not modern it's as old as people. Kings, Emperors, Popes, Czars, Pharos, Sultans, Moghuls .... Democracy was invented to prevent that happening. Of course if the stupids elect someone who wants to be one of those, they're going to get one. And now you've got one. Well done, you're going to get eaten alive. The stupids win.Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London. Olen Suomi Soy Barcelona. I am Ukraine. "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10299 Joined: Member Rating: 7.2 |
Phat writes: Nope. Im the type of guy who encourages the smaller kids to join together to take on the bully rather than beating him up myself when I don't have the strength. Europe is well able to take care of itself. Please look up what happened in the years of 1914 and 1939 in Europe. Hint: It starts with "WW".
The *only reason* that the progressives favor what we do in Ukraine is because it supposedly helps the stock market and fosters relations with Social Democratic Europe. Progressives favor European countries not being forcefully taken over by their neighbors. See above.
Trump will likely attempt to stop the war by ignoring Europe and doing business with BRICS. The effect of that (they hope) will be to slow the demise of the US Dollar. Trump has openly supported weakening and devaluing the US Dollar. Will Trump Get His Wish for a Weaker Dollar? by Kenneth Rogoff - Project Syndicate
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22945 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 6.9
|
Phat writes in Message 1155: Europe is well able to take care of itself. It's comments like this that earned your post two downvotes. It deserved more. Taq already reminded you that Europe needed our much belated help in WWI and WWII, but you knew that, right? So given this history why would you say this? And Europe still needs our involvement in their defense today. We actually want it that way because it gives us a great deal of power and influence. Were the United States to lessen its presence in Europe then other countries would move to fill the power and economic vacuum. Power-wise that would likely be Russia. Also, the EU is our biggest trading partner when goods, services and investments are taken together, even bigger than Canada or Mexico or China.
The *only reason* that the progressives favor what we do in Ukraine is because it supposedly helps the stock market and fosters relations with Social Democratic Europe. Because you're incapable of making this stuff up yourself, I assume it's coming from YouTube videos.
Many analysts fear a market meltdown as the dollar devalues and the US runs out of money (without more "quantitative easing"! ) And could you please keep your financial nuttiness out of threads where it's off-topic. This thread's about the war in Ukraine. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18647 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.3 |
dwise1:I can't speak for all evangelicals by any means but I will say that *they* are in no hurry for the good times to be over for good. (Merle Haggard song) Christians in America want prosperity like anyone else and they want peace. What they don't want is diversity amongst religions nations or ideologies. They want unity. In our minds,(Conservative believers) unity is only achievable through Jesus Christ. This is the stumbling block that prevents unity...now globally. dwise1:In the case of the Middle East, there has so far never been a workable consensus in a religious context. Iran sponsors terror in the hopes of taking the thorn out of their side. (Israel). Israel wants peace through strength and in eliminating all of their enemies. Their enemies are of course the people who see them as the thorn. dwise1:You speak of professionalism in the military, but what about the alleged statements of Admiral Rob Bauer? Putin took them to mean that NATO was turning offensive rather than defensive. Today's United States is different than the United States in 1950.
Military struggles to bring Gen Z into the armed forces War makes tougher people, but not necessarily empathetic people.When both religious and non-religious people reach the same conclusions then you know religion isn't the reason.--Percy God alone is God *but* God is not alone~Ellis Potter We see Monsters where Science shows us Windmills.~Phat, remixed Critics would of course say that "God" is a product of human imagination...but then again God may well declare that all of creation is a product of His imagination! Its all in perspective of the the observer.~Phat
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 6076 Joined: Member Rating: 7.2 |
Whisky Tango Foxtrot, Mike? (What the f**k, man?)
You claim to be replying to one of my messages from more than two years ago (ie, Message 211 -- 07-Mar-2022), yet nothing you write addresses that message. IOW, you are not actually replying to that message in any way. Instead, you quote from and respond to my message Message 492 (19-Nov-2024) over in the Israel Declares War For The First Time Since 1973. topic without any attempt to identify what you are replying to. Almost as if you want to hide something. As if you don't want anyone to be able to go back to the original message and see what it really says and in what context. Sorry if I appear to be overreacting, but I had been watching a critique video about a professional creationist video (Calvin Smith of AIG Canada) whose title claims "I Studied Evolution IN-DEPTH" (like almost every creationist claims) and yet he, like all other creationists, displays abject ignorance of evolution and instead rails against strawmen that have little if anything to do with evolution. Plus they lie incessantly and are highly dishonest. So when you display similar behavior, or at least appear to, I cannot react very kindly. So, what are you trying to pull?
I can't speak for all evangelicals by any means but I will say that *they* are in no hurry for the good times to be over for good. (Merle Haggard song) Christians in America want prosperity like anyone else and they want peace. What they don't want is diversity amongst religions nations or ideologies. They want unity. In our minds,(Conservative believers) unity is only achievable through Jesus Christ. This is the stumbling block that prevents unity...now globally. Rank-and-file members, maybe. But their movements embrace the End Times. Pat Robertson even had a plan to set up loudspeakers in Jerusalem and throughout the world to broadcast his proselytizing efforts with the goal of fulfilling one of the trigger points for the End Times, that everybody must have heard the Word and given the chance to be saved; when that last person declines Salvation then is when the bad times roll. Your assessment reminded me of the part in Episode 1 of the BBC TV production of The_Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (1981, available on Hulu last I looked) where the earth is destroyed by the Vogon Destructor Fleet to make way for a hyperspatial bypass (painted bulldozer yellow just like the bulldozer sent to destroy Arthur Dent's home to make way for a bypass, British for a highway). When the destructor fleet appears in the sky, the camera trolleys past a line of pedestrians looking up at it, ending with a street preacher wearing a sandwich sign saying "THE END IS NIGH!". Then when the destructor fleet commander announces their imminent destruction we have the same trolley shot where everybody is shouting angrily at the fleet, stopping at the empty sandwich sign because that street preacher had left it behind when he ran away in terror. Sorry, I couldn't find a clip of that on YouTube. So why do Evangelicals support Israel? It's certainly not because they love the Jews so much, because they despise the Jews. Rather, it's only because the restoration of the State of Israel is key their End Time prophesies. It's not because of pilgrimages to visit the sites described in the Bible, because that would happen even without Israel as it had for centuries past (eg, Mark Twain's book, The Innocents Abroad, or The New Pilgrim's Progress: Being Some Account of the Steamship "Quaker City's" Pleasure Excursion to Europe and the Holy Land; with Descriptions of Countries, Nations, Incidents, and Adventures, as They Appeared to the Author). Rather the primary importance of Israel to Evangelicals is its role in the End Times. Indeed, along with the usual pilgrimage stops they make sure to visit the plain of Armageddon where they revel in its prophesized role. Getting a little short on time now. We could also discuss the difference between premillennialism and postmillennialism and how that traditionally affected the hyper-religious such that the Baptists, who believed that the Thousand Year Rule would come after Jesus returned, whereas the Christian Reconstructionists believed that Jesus would return after they had established that Thousand Year Rule. As a result, Baptists avoided political involvement, but that changed c. 1980 when they embraced the Christian Reconstructionist political agenda of turning America into an Old Testament theocracy and gave rise to what is now known as Christian Nationalism. Part of the Baptist attitude included not caring about conservation, etc, because they saw the world as falling apart anyway in keeping with their End Times mentality ("Why would you bother to polish the brass on a sinking ship?"). Remember, I spent some time with those people. They were obsessed with two things: 1) demons, and 2) the End Times. They may have become less virulent, at least outwardly, but that mania is still there.
dwise1:In the case of the Middle East, there has so far never been a workable consensus in a religious context. Iran sponsors terror in the hopes of taking the thorn out of their side. (Israel). Israel wants peace through strength and in eliminating all of their enemies. Their enemies are of course the people who see them as the thorn. Has nothing to do with what I had written. Try reading it again.
dwise1:You speak of professionalism in the military, but what about the alleged statements of Admiral Rob Bauer? Putin took them to mean that NATO was turning offensive rather than defensive. What the fuck are you talking about? Who the fuck is ADM Rob Bauer (is that RADM, VADM, or ADM, what is/was his command, etc?) and what is he supposed to have said and within what context? And why are you withholding that extremely pertinent information from us? There's that stench of dishonesty coming from you again.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9489 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 6.1 |
Nope. Didn't miss your idiocy.
What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. -Christopher Hitchens Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up, why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22945 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 6.9 |
Another "disengage brain, put fingers in gear" post.
--Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22945 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 6.9
|
A sub-headline from the Washington Post reads The Russian leader’s use of the [nuclear capable] missile against Ukraine sends a powerful signal about his intention to weaken NATO and bend Europe’s security architecture to Russia’s will.. The article continues:
Washington Post: This is more evidence, as if more were needed, of Putin's intentions for Russian expansion, and Ukraine is just the first stepping stone on his way into eastern Europe and NATO territory. If Putin is allowed to take Ukraine then it will be the beginning of the end for a free eastern Europe and of a powerful and united NATO. A free Ukraine is essential for western security. But Trump doesn't see it that way. Trump's traditional ambiguity leaves him lots of wiggle room, and even when he's clearly stated a position he has no qualms about spinning on a dime and taking a different position, but to this point Trump has appeared very skeptical and hesitant about support for Ukraine. If Trump had had been a political presence in the years leading up to and during WWII he would have been one of those saying that it was Europe's problem and that we didn't really need Europe. And in the Pacific he probably would have advocated letting Midway and Wake and perhaps even Hawaii go, and today a powerful and antagonistic Japanese military would rule almost all of Asia. Unless saner heads prevail, which seems unlikely in a Trump administration, Trump will lead us into a diminished role in a more dangerous world. --Percy
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024