Coffee House Musings on Creationist Topic Proposals

Whatever "knows evolution" means.

I didn't cut'n'paste that number in. I used my own words; I didn't copy them from anywhere.That little number "6" popped up again about a week later, but I can't figure out where it came from.

Irrelevant.

There was no citation. There was no cover-up.

Nothing in your post demonstrates that vaccines could not be developed without the theory of universal common descent.

Why?

Did some hill-billy teach you that "proof" means the same as "a theory supported by evidence"? As far as I know, there is no such teaching in science.Perhaps in your mind, your strongly-held atheist belief in ToE has somehow morphed into "proof". If so, that would amount to a delusion. I don't recall claiming that such an assumption equates to proof ... or even that such an assumption is provable. 1. No, not "without evidence, without reasoning".
2. When did I claim that your "documented mechanism, as in ToE, are wrong"?

My natural inclination is toward trust, but the character you've exhibited here so far tells me that would be foolish in this case.The superscript issue is minor, but regardless of what really happened, that it's the remnants of a cut-n-paste you did is consistent with your other behavior here. That's the problem people create for themselves when they behave badly. They get blamed for any bad things that happen even when they're not actually responsible. What browser and machine type are you using (Windows? Mac? iPhone? Android?). I'll investigate the possible ways a superscript 6 could get inserted in a textbox (other than cut-n-pasting). I've already demonstrated to myself that on a Macbook Pro using Chrome (that's my personal setup) it isn't possible.--Percy

Edited by Percy, : Minor clarification.

Might be time to cut the lying troll lose. Even Faith wasn't this bad.

As a participant I can take no administrative action in this thread.--Percy

Given that he was identified as a troll hundreds of post ago, why are we still feeding him?

And the cover-up continues.

Incidentally, French has a third word for that, reconnaître. I suppose Spanish, German, etc. do too.I didn't read the rest of your quote. Stop doing that.

You don't know very far.But there wouldn't be anything in science about proof, would there? Because, y'know, science doesn't deal in proof.

You tell me. Since YECs claim to know so much more about science than scientists do, why don't YECs develop vaccines? Why don't YECs produce ANYTHING useful?