The Power of the New Intelligent Design...

No, when you talk about novel body plans and organs I don't know what you mean and you don't seem to ever have an answer. The only people I ever hear talking about novel body plans and organs are young earth creationists like you.

Wow, in that case, you're an ignoramus who's read nothing about the evolutionary history of life on earth. Without the (alleged) evolution of novel body plans and organs, there would be nothing for evolutionary scientists to write about!!Pray tell, how did the first life-forms (allegedly bacteria) evolve into all the other life-forms without the evolution of novel body plans and organs?There would be literally thousands of scientific papers and articles published that discuss the evolution of novel body plans and organs. Here are just a few:
The Evolutionary Origins of Body Plans (Chapter 7) - Understanding Evo-DevoThe Evolution of Complex Organs | Evolution: Education and Outreach | Full TextOrigins of the other metazoan body plans: the evolution of larval forms - PMChttps://www.sciencedirect.com/...ticle/pii/S0960982219305342https://www.sciencedirect.com/...ticle/pii/S1567133X19302054JSTOR: Access Check

And I note that YOU still haven't described a single novel body plan or organ. Novel implies something completely new and unlike anything prior.Evolutionary processes do not produce novel body plans or organs in a single generation (which is the strawman you are implying), that's something that an ignoramus creationist would believe.

Name a novel body plan and novel organs. There's your evidence. Go read up.

Those are scientific theories, not stories. Is name calling all you have? Are you 5 years old?

Tragically, his problems are much worse. He eats stale crackers with 2000 year-old jesus meat. His mind is lost to reality.

I love your sense of humour!

Ever heard of the Cambrian explosion?

I don't think Cambrian explosion is a body plan or a novel organ. It's a time period that lasted some 30 million years.

Name a novel body plan and novel organs.

So you are 5 years old.

Thanks for pointing this out.I thought the major argument for common ancestry was that we have so much of our DNA in common with different species that appear to be very different, including plants and such.So it turns out that we actually don't.

Don't you think that 40-50% of your genome shared with onion qualifies as "that we have so much of our DNA in common with different species"?Half seems rather substantial unless you are trying to force a specific conclusion from loose syntax."that we have so much of our DNA in common with different species" seems to indicate we are talking about more than one gene. I would suggest half your genome is a rather large and significant portion to share with other organisms.So it turns out, yes, we do in fact share significant portions of our genome with plants and such strongly evidencing common ancestry quite pointedly.[abe]Have a look at the genes we share in the onion genome. What do those genes do? Why are they the same genes we share with not just onion but most of multi-cellular life? Common ancestry through evolution provides and clear answer as to why.

Only the new ID could explain the correct explanation of Gravity.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XO6Tqr02ENQ&lc=UgywRafvDY...

I watched the video.It is a steaming pile of horse manure.This is probably the most confused and garbled "explanation" of general relativity that I have ever seen.I suggest treating it as comedy.