The Power of the New Intelligent Design...

What is the "data" that I keep trying to deny?

You forgot to mention that the biological sciences as taught at most universities are seriously tainted and distorted by Atheism's preferred creation story ... Darwinism.

Everyone knows so-called evangelical so-called churches harbour disproportionate numbers of fruit-cakes and nut-jobs.

And a large part of the cure for Darwinist bullshit is honesty.

In that case, any two organisms could form a nested hierarchy. A bacterium and a human being form a nested hierarchy ... wait, where have I heard that before?

Where would Darwinism be without its army of liars ?

​ You're in denial. If huge evolutionary gaps in the fossil record aren't real, explain why dDawkins wrote this:"Eldredge and Gould certainly would agree that some very important gaps really are due to imperfections in the fossil record. Very big gaps, too. For example the Cambrian strata of rocks, vintage about 600 million years, are the oldest ones in which we find most of the major invertebrate groups. And we find many of them already in an advanced state of evolution, the very first time they appear. It is as though they were just planted there, without any evolutionary history ...
My point here is that, when we are talking about gaps of this magnitude, there is no difference whatever in the interpretations of 'punctuationists' and 'gradualists'."(Dawkins, Richard, "The Blind Watchmaker," [1986], Penguin: London, 1991 reprint, p.229-230)

No ... but I once visited an unnatural history museum. ... just like if I go to Disney Land I can actually see Mickey Mouse.

​ Your ignorance-ridden delusion is APauling.

My new topic proposal is a model for point mutations in neutral DNA, where mutations do not give benefit or disadvantage to the individual.Next relevant question would be, to estimate what portion of DNA this would apply to. How big of a part of DNA can be considered as "junk" and non-functional, where mutations have no effect to the organism?

You evaded my question ... in other words, you don't know that humans descended from bacteria. So, as usual, you're full of it.

I neither accept nor deny common ancestry within phyla. Like everyone else, I don't know what happened. Genetic evidence can be interpreted as all life forming a nested hierarchy ... or as the Creator using the same biological blueprint to fashion all life ... or both.

[Taq]When someone says that a theory has been proven true it is in the same sense that someone is proven guilty in a court of law.[/qs] Which scientific theory "has been proven true"?

Which scientific theory "has been proven true"?

Thank you for trying to warn me. You're such a good friend.