|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 45 (9208 total) |
| |
anil dahar | |
Total: 919,510 Year: 6,767/9,624 Month: 107/238 Week: 24/83 Day: 0/3 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: An Ether-Based Creation Model | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4597 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 9.1 |
In my Model, on the other hand, the smallest units are referred to as (still more-rarified, than neutrinos, and undetectable for us) elemental ether units. You need to come up with better names. "Elemental ether units" sucks as a name. I'm going to start using a more functional name: Etherors. Just as no one wants to call electrons "electromagnetic force carrier units", so you should start using "etheror" for your basic imaginary and undetectable units. If you don't come up with better names, no one is going to pay any attention to your model.Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned! What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 98 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
What's wrong with calling it just what it is, Pixie Dust?
My Website: My Website
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8654 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 6.6 |
Tinyweenium. Ignoranfimal. Mentalphallium. Insanitite.
Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4597 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 9.1 |
Wait just a minute! Wasn't "Insanitite" the product name for Trump's scam where he was selling his brain cells for $20 each? Then it turned out he didn't have any detectable brain cells so the had to use frog brain cells and we all know what happened next. Hmmmm, or maybe that was the "uvbencondium" scam?
Tinyweenium. Ignoranfimal. Mentalphallium. Insanitite. Anyway, all good names for Michael to consider!Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned! What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael MD Member (Idle past 781 days) Posts: 108 Joined: |
To correct a mis-statement in your Post. - I do have a possible field test of my Ether Model. I have described it in a few earlier posts here, so I won't go through it again, except to mention again that it would be designed to tap into naturally-occurring etheric forces, and checking a prediction that objects inside the test-system will undergo a decrease in their density (an effect not produced by known forces.)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 98 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
To correct a mis-statement in your Post. - I do have a possible field test of my Pixie Dust Model. I have described it in a few earlier posts here, so I won't go through it again, except to mention again that it would be designed to tap into naturally-occurring pixie dust forces, and checking a prediction that objects inside the test-system will undergo a increase in their glowosity (an effect not produced by known forces.)
Fixed it for you.My Website: My Website
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 6077 Joined: Member Rating: 7.1
|
I have described it in a few earlier posts here, so I won't go through it again, ... What? You won't even reference your own message? Well, that certainly does send a message and not a good one. I recommend that you edit your message by appending an ABE ("Added By Edit") that contains a link to your message in question. There are two ways to do that:
That way you will appear to have nothing to hide instead of looking like you're trying to be devious.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9489 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 6.1 |
You have absolutely no idea what science is.
Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. -Christopher Hitchens Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael MD Member (Idle past 781 days) Posts: 108 Joined: |
My previous mentions of my possible field-test did not include any additional information as to the exact details of what it would involve, besides what I just gave in my last Post. So there wouldn't be any point in referencing those earlier mentions of "field testing" the Ether Model.
I would go into those details only to a potential financial sponsor.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18652 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.2
|
MD writes: Note that a financial sponsor with any normal credibility would insist on some sort of report as to what they were financially supporting. It seems to me that your whole idea is your own theory or belief and not scientifically backed according to the rules of evidence and mainstream science. In order for someone to back you, they would have to believe in you. Otherwise, the whole topic devolves into a hypothetical pipe dream. They could of course share your enthusiasm for your "model" or dream. This is a tough crowd here...you likely wouldn't get a dollar out of any of them. I would go into those details only to a potential financial sponsor."A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " *** “…far from science having buried God, not only do the results of science point towards his existence, but the scientific enterprise itself is validated by his existence.”- Dr.John Lennox “A God without wrath brought men without sin into a Kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a Cross.” “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of a doubt, what is laid before him.” — Leo Tolstoy, The Kingdom of God is Within You
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 6077 Joined: Member Rating: 7.1 |
OK, ducking and dodging and avoiding even the appearance of full transparency.
At least we know whom we're dealing with.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 98 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
What is so sad is that there are so many many examples out there on how to propose a new condition and how to test that proposed condition. A classic example is Einsteins proposal of gravitational lensing. Einstein proposed a new condition, that gravity could actually bend light and also proposed a method that could test his proposal. It stated what things would be needed as well as what should be observed and only a few years later Eddington was able to use the method outlined by Einstein to conclusively prove Einstein correct.
The difference is that Einstein published all the necessary models, method, process and procedures that would be needed for the test while NotanMD refuses to do anything including actually defining any of the terms he regurgitates. NotanMD is simply pathetic.My Website: My Website
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 671 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
MichaelMD writes:
And that potential sponsor would immediately run your details past some scientific types who would tell him what you've been told here, that you're a crank. I would go into those details only to a potential financial sponsor. You might have a chance if your cranky idea had some economic potential, like an engine that runs on water."I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!" -- Lucky Ned Pepper
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 6077 Joined: Member Rating: 7.1 |
You might have a chance if your cranky idea had some economic potential, like an engine that runs on water. Or, to keep in line with current business practices (including Trumpian economics), if that financial sponsor can promote that cranky idea in order to bilk investors.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stile Member (Idle past 303 days) Posts: 4295 From: Ontario, Canada Joined:
|
dwise1 writes: Or, to keep in line with current business practices... I am reading scammy vibes. "Oh, I'll show you the proof... just give me money first, cash only!" I'm pretty sure MD stands for "Nigerian Prince."
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024