Let’s take a look at these arguments.
quote:
Changed Lives.
Are certainly not unique to Christianity. And some Christians have been pretty dreadful people. Consider Ivan the Terrible (Terrible was complimentary in those days - more like Awesome. But he was a really terrible person). Or Vlad Tepes - aka Vlad the Impaler.
quote:
What was it about early Christians,for instance, that was perceived as a threat, apart from refusing to bow to some egotistical Caesar?
To the extent they were perceived as a threat, their atheism (refusing to worship or sacrifice to any of the Roman Gods) possibly their Jewish connections, or trouble-making. It certainly wasn’t because they were seen as wonderfully good people.
quote:
Why were Christians used as human candles and burned?
If that story is true, it was for burning down Rome. It seems likely - but not certain - that Nero used Christians (an unpopular cult) as scapegoats. The punishment itself is even more uncertain.
quote:
Impact upon History. The fact that so many people throughout time have spent so much energy attempting to discredit and disprove Christian beliefs and dogma. Why the energy against? Do we see as much zeal aginst Buddhism? Judaism? Islam? Now I will grant that some Christians themselves oppose Islam, though by and large seem more favorable towards Judaism. Why is that?
Critiques of Christianity mainly come from places where Christianity is dominant, from people who grew up in a Christian-influenced environment and are reacting against it. That’s not evidence that Christianity is true. Why should people to who. Islam is just another religion with little impact on their lives really care about attacking it?indeed, what do you count as attacks? Exposing the falsehood proclaimed by Christian apologists? I hope not.
Im addition there are adherents of other religions who attack Christianity for the same reasons that Christians attack other religions. That is again no surprise and no reason to think that any of the religions is true.
And of course Christian attacks on Judaism only apply to Judaism after Jesus - or the Christians would be attacking their own beliefs. But they do exist and some are very nasty (see the Blood Libel for one - another great example of Christians not being good at all). Christianity is an offshoot of Judaism while Islam is an offshoot off Christianity - that’s the difference,
More importantly are attacks really evidence of truth? There have been a lot of attacks on Communism - should we believe in Marxism because of that?
Should we take the attacks on the Mormons - both written and those involving actual violence - as evidence that Mormonism is true?
Should Protestant attacks on Catholicism be seen as evidence that Catholicism really is the True Church?
I don’t think so. For any of them. And I doubt that you do either.
If people did a survey of religions and decided to attack Christianity solely because of its content that would maybe show something (but even then it might not be that Christianity is true). But in reality the social context is always an important consideration - almost always the most important consideration.
So no, this is a very bad argument.
™ Version 4.2
