quote:
If what you say is true there was never any reason for an investigation at all since the whole point would have been to find something to charge him with or find nothing.
No, the point wat to gather evidence for the House, so they could decide whether to start impeachment proceedings. The House decided not to, but that’s because the obstruction was largely unsuccessful and because the House needed a really strong case to get past the Senate.
quote:
Starr found crimes to charge Clinton with.
Clinton was impeached, not prosecuted. And his offences were not deemed serious enough to remove him from office. You make my point. Even then Starr hounded Clinton to an extent well beyond anything Mueller did.
quote:
. In Trump's case nothing was found, he's innocent, he's not guilty, he's exonerated, there is nothing to charge him with, it's only wishful thinking that keeps this charade alive.
Outright falsehoods as usual.