|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Exposing the evolution theory. Part 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 7857 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 2.9 |
You made so many errors in your logic already, your opinion is worthless to me. They are worthless to everyone. Only the science rules and the science proves you wrong.Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 343 Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Still don't care about your opinion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 7857 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 2.9 |
Still don't care about your opinion That is not my opinion. That is a known scientific fact. You are wrong. The nested hierarchy does add proof to common descent.Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 343 Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
You don't know what facts are. A fact is something that is true with absolute certainty. Your flawed theory of common descent is not. Keep lying, as dishonest as you evolutionists are.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 9664 Joined: Member Rating: 3.2
|
sensei writes: If you describe life as a nested hierarchy and conclude that it is due to evolution from a common ancestry, then that is your conclusion. If that is a faulty conclusion, then please tell me what pattern of shared features common ancestry should produce if it isn't a nested hierarchy.
If we find a dead body and you assume that it is from murder, I would say that it could also be from an accident, from disease or from old age. If we find a body riddled with bullet holes, wouldn't that be evidence for murder? In the same way, isn't a nested hierarchy evidence for common ancestry?
I don't deny at all, that some sort of nested pattern could arise if life had evolved. Wouldn't this make a nested hierarchy a piece of evidence in support of common ancestry?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 9664 Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
sensei writes: Babies grow starting with all necessary DNA alreasdy present. Not from nothing. Where did that DNA come from? Did it come from a natural source, or a supernatural one? What do we see all around us? Do we see natural reproduction, or life being created by supernatural deities?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 343 Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Who says it is full of bullet holes? Ifs are irrelevant.
If we could turn back time and see how and where life originated, that would prove one or the other. Also, you are missing the point. Doubting the cause of death does not mean that murder does not result in death. Your side seems to think so nonetheless, which is a logical fallacy. But you fail to recognize it, so you may never learn.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 343 Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
We are discussing how DNA evolved. Not how already evolved DNA forms a body. Stick to the topic.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 9664 Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
sensei writes: We are discussing how DNA evolved. Not how already evolved DNA forms a body. Every child is born with 50 to 100 new mutations. No genome is finished evolved. All genomes are evolving, constantly. We learn how DNA evolves by watching it evolve.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 9664 Joined: Member Rating: 3.2
|
sensei writes: If we could turn back time and see how and where life originated, that would prove one or the other. How life originated is irrelevant to the question of common ancestry and evolution. If God created the first single celled organism that all life evolved from nothing in the theory of evolution would need to be changed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 343 Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
And once again you managed to miss the point completely.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 9664 Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
sensei writes: And once again you managed to miss the point completely. I hit it dead center. You are just incapable of responding.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 343 Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Sure, in your puny little mind.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 9664 Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
sensei writes: Sure, in your puny little mind.
I'm not the one who has to stoop to insults.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 343 Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
It's an observation that fits the model of a simpelton mind. You provided the data. I merely observed it.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2023