Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 57 (9189 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: Michaeladams
Upcoming Birthdays: marc9000
Post Volume: Total: 918,966 Year: 6,223/9,624 Month: 71/240 Week: 14/72 Day: 1/13 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Biological Evolution ⇒

Exposing the evolution theory. Part 1

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Exposing the evolution theory. Part 1
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3962
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 8.1

Normal Thread Display
Message 12 of 41 (844384)
11-29-2018 2:19 AM 		Reply to: Message 11 by Tanypteryx
11-29-2018 1:14 AM

Re: Burgess Shale etc.
Only a very small percentage of exposed Cambrian rocks contain fossils from the early Cambrian, such as those found in the Burgess Shales.
​
Kudos for the link.
​
I believe, however, that the Burgess Shale is actually middle Cambrian (per Wikipedia- Cambrian=541 to 485.4 mya (million years ago); Burgess Shale=508 mya; I also seem to recall your cite site saying the Burgess was 40 million years into the Cambrian).
​
Anyway, this makes me wonder what the fossil record is for the 541 to 508 mya period. Too tired and/or lazy to do the research myself.
​
Moose
​
Edited by Minnemooseus, : Add Wikipedia links.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-29-2018 1:14 AM Tanypteryx has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-29-2018 2:26 AM Minnemooseus has seen this message but not replied
 Message 14 by PaulK, posted 11-29-2018 2:43 AM Minnemooseus has seen this message but not replied
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3962
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 8.1

Normal Thread Display

(1)
Message 16 of 41 (844395)
11-29-2018 3:40 AM 		Reply to: Message 15 by dwise1
11-29-2018 3:06 AM

Re: Just Exactly What the Heck is "Naturalistic Theory"?
Just what the hell are you talking about when you say "naturalistic theory"?
​
I would think that "naturalistic theory" would be the counterpart to "supernaturalistic theory", aka "Goddidit". And "Goddidit" is about all that "supernaturalistic theory" has to it.
​
"Naturalistic theory" deals in the physical evidence (aka "worldly reality"). Which is the only thing real science has available to work with.
​
Moose
This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by dwise1, posted 11-29-2018 3:06 AM dwise1 has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by dwise1, posted 11-29-2018 4:09 AM Minnemooseus has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024