Any practical use for Universal Common Ancestor?

So your "evolution of the gaps" was just trolli.Those gaps keep shrinking.

Those particular gaps may or may not be shrinking. Others are. Not explaining everything is not in itself a reason for discarding a theory.OTOH a fantasy like your aliens, which answers every question with "aliens did it" is identical to the creationist "God did it". It explains nothing.

Er, that's not how it works. The act of posting is making a claim of relevance for which you are responsible for (and obviously incapable of) supporting. .YECs have a habit of not "allowing" any logical deductions from their messages, acknowledging only strict literal readings. Seems to be a consequence of their inabilities. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

Creationists need a guru. Darwin is that. They can't conceive of anyone believing anything without one. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

Your "understanding" is nonsense.

Unexplained is not necessarily unexplainable.

I've run into old-Earth-young-life creationists before.

Different measurement methods yield slightly different results.The similarly is well over 90%.

So you neglected to mention the whole point.So what? What evidence do you have that the rest of the genome would make any difference? Do you know the difference between the tested part and the untested part? Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

We know the calibre of human we are talking to.

He thinks he's a special kind of loud mouth asshole.He should have seen talk.origins in the 90's. Karl Crawford, Ted Holden, Zoe Althrop...He's a dilettante. Those trolls were dedicated to their craft for years.

Aliens could choose to replicate a phylogenetic signal. Easy-peasyThere's an answer to every question, and yet there's no answers.

Both are true.Duh.

I think you are ascribing that comment to the wrong person. But I would love an explanation of what is wrong with my comment.