Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 61 (9209 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: The Rutificador chile
Post Volume: Total: 919,503 Year: 6,760/9,624 Month: 100/238 Week: 17/83 Day: 0/8 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Any practical use for Universal Common Ancestor?
Pressie
Member (Idle past 232 days)
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 43 of 1385 (843862)
11-22-2018 4:29 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dredge
11-20-2018 8:07 AM


dredge writes:
I've been looking for a practical use in applied science for the information that all life on earth evolved from a microbe...
Luckily for humanity no form of the earth sciences even claims that.
dredge writes:
... that existed billions of years ago, but can't find any.
Maybe it's because you don't have a clue what science is? That's why.
dredge writes:
It seems to me that the whole Universal Common Ancestor thing is completely irrelevant and useless outside the realm of evolutionary theory.
That's what happens when you are ignorant enough to believe that Periods are layers despite having been corrected multiple times.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dredge, posted 11-20-2018 8:07 AM Dredge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Faith, posted 11-22-2018 2:22 PM Pressie has replied
 Message 48 by caffeine, posted 11-22-2018 2:35 PM Pressie has replied
 Message 84 by Dredge, posted 03-07-2019 12:48 AM Pressie has not replied

  
Pressie
Member (Idle past 232 days)
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 63 of 1385 (843937)
11-23-2018 3:47 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by caffeine
11-22-2018 2:35 PM


It's not a microbe. It's from a population of microbes. Plural.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by caffeine, posted 11-22-2018 2:35 PM caffeine has not replied

  
Pressie
Member (Idle past 232 days)
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 64 of 1385 (843938)
11-23-2018 3:51 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by Faith
11-22-2018 2:22 PM


I changed it. I humbly ask foregiveness for my mistake.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Faith, posted 11-22-2018 2:22 PM Faith has seen this message but not replied

  
Pressie
Member (Idle past 232 days)
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


(1)
Message 1040 of 1385 (853056)
05-22-2019 6:17 AM
Reply to: Message 1029 by Dredge
05-21-2019 10:16 PM


Re: Progressive Creation and Aliens (oh my) - no predictive ability - take 2
Dredge writes:
What the evolutionary ancestors of a trilobite? Algae? Bacteria?
He-he-he. None of the above. You really, really have to study even a bit of Biology.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1029 by Dredge, posted 05-21-2019 10:16 PM Dredge has not replied

  
Pressie
Member (Idle past 232 days)
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 1175 of 1385 (854020)
06-04-2019 8:48 AM
Reply to: Message 1167 by Dredge
06-04-2019 2:23 AM


Re: Another useful application of evolutionary theory
Dredge writes:
This fact contradicts your Darwinist fantasy that a dog can eventually be bred into a non-dog
If a dog could eventually be bred into a non-dog it would completely falsify evolutionary theory as that is the opposite of what evolutionary theory predicts.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1167 by Dredge, posted 06-04-2019 2:23 AM Dredge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1186 by Dredge, posted 06-05-2019 2:59 AM Pressie has replied

  
Pressie
Member (Idle past 232 days)
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 1187 of 1385 (854146)
06-05-2019 5:45 AM
Reply to: Message 1186 by Dredge
06-05-2019 2:59 AM


Re: Another useful application of evolutionary theory
Dredge writes:
Is that so? Please do explain.
When a mommy and a poppy love each other very much . .the stork doesn’t bring them a kitten.
The basics Dredge. Maybe you should wait till you’re older than 6 to be getting mommy to type your incoherent ramblings and paste it on this forum?
Dredge writes:
If a reptile could be bred into a bird, would that the be the opposite of what evolutionary theory predicts too?
Yip. Populations evolve. Individuals don’t.
The basics Dredge. Maybe you should wait till you’re older than 6 to be getting mommy to type your incoherent ramblings and paste it on this forum?
Dredge writes:
How about a single-cell organism being bred into a double-cell organism?
Where does evolutionary theory predict that? Why would a single cell organism evolve into a double-cell organism? Populations evolve. Individuals don’t. Even after that; where does evolutionary theory predict that populations of unicellular organisms must evolve into double-cell organisms?
The basics Dredge. Maybe you should wait till you’re older than 6 to be getting mommy to type your incoherent ramblings and paste it on this forum?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1186 by Dredge, posted 06-05-2019 2:59 AM Dredge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1220 by Dredge, posted 06-09-2019 3:21 AM Pressie has not replied

  
Pressie
Member (Idle past 232 days)
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


(3)
Message 1256 of 1385 (855945)
06-25-2019 4:55 AM
Reply to: Message 1255 by Dredge
06-24-2019 10:39 PM


Dredge writes:
In other words, you can't provide a practical use in applied science for the Darwinian explanation for the fossil record.
I can. The very idea of it pisses creationists off. That's more than enough practical use for me!
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1255 by Dredge, posted 06-24-2019 10:39 PM Dredge has not replied

  
Pressie
Member (Idle past 232 days)
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


(1)
Message 1281 of 1385 (857044)
07-05-2019 6:24 AM
Reply to: Message 1280 by Dredge
07-04-2019 11:15 PM


Dredge writes:
I asked for an example of how the Darwinian explanation...
I'm not too sure what you mean. The world of science has moved on since 1859. After all, a "Darwinian explanation" means natural selection.
In evolutionary theory, we mean things like natural selection, genetic variation, gene flow, gene capture, sexual selection, genetic drift, genetic hitchiking, neutral theory, etc.
So, what are you asking?
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1280 by Dredge, posted 07-04-2019 11:15 PM Dredge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1286 by Dredge, posted 07-05-2019 10:45 PM Pressie has replied

  
Pressie
Member (Idle past 232 days)
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 1295 of 1385 (857544)
07-09-2019 8:11 AM
Reply to: Message 1286 by Dredge
07-05-2019 10:45 PM


dredge writes:
You don't understand the Darwinian theories of common descent and descent with modification?
If not, try neo-Darwinian theory.
Does your idea of it involve neutral theory?
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1286 by Dredge, posted 07-05-2019 10:45 PM Dredge has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024