The Sudden Dawn of the Cosmos and the Constancy of Physical Laws

PaulK did not reject logic. He rejected the assumptions you are making about logic. Speaking as a mathematician -- no, it isn't.

Quantum particles do not need to get permission from logic before they act as they do. Logic is not about the physical world. It is about our descriptions (including our descriptions of the physical world). That's an empirical question, not a mathematical question.

You can click on "peek" to see how it was done.

As best I can tell, he is practicing Christian Apologetics.He seems to be mastering the art of making really bad arguments.

Thanks for being open about that. Your posts might be stylistic, but they lack quality. Most people don't take time to phrase their words. They just blurt out what they want to say. And, most of the time, that turns out okay, though perhaps the wording can give some unintended laughs.I'm not trying to criticize you here. Rather, I'm suggesting that you try to be more relaxed and stop concerning yourself with matters of style. Just communicate as best you can, and we will deal with that as best we can.

The better statement would be that humans are sentient and experience sight, feeling, and thought. And it appears that this also applies to other animals - probably most mammals, birds, and perhaps octopus.There's no actual evidence that minds exist, except as an abstraction.