EvC Forum: The Sudden Dawn of the Cosmos and the Constancy of Physical Laws

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: The Sudden Dawn of the Cosmos and the Constancy of Physical Laws

RAZD

Member (Idle past 1698 days)

Posts: 20714

From: the other end of the sidewalk

Joined: 03-14-2004

Normal Thread Display

Message 7 of 244 (821970)
10-16-2017 4:27 PM

Reply to: Message 5 by Phat
10-16-2017 1:46 PM

links

Did the laws of physics apply before the big bang?

You had a space after "... -big-bang" before the ]

the other link is not a picture (you need to "copy image location")

Enjoy

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
	Message 5 by Phat, posted 10-16-2017 1:46 PM		Phat has seen this message but not replied

RAZD

Member (Idle past 1698 days)

Posts: 20714

From: the other end of the sidewalk

Joined: 03-14-2004

Normal Thread Display

Message 27 of 244 (822030)
10-17-2017 9:08 PM

Reply to: Message 24 by Phat
10-17-2017 4:11 PM

Re: Predictable Behavior?

Yellowstone could blow up, too. The chance of that happening is likely greater than the laws of Physics changing.

That actually happened. Yellowstone is one large caldera and the ash spread beyond the Mississippi. So yes, that could happen again.

Enjoy

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
	Message 24 by Phat, posted 10-17-2017 4:11 PM		Phat has not replied

RAZD

Member (Idle past 1698 days)

Posts: 20714

From: the other end of the sidewalk

Joined: 03-14-2004

Normal Thread Display

(2)

Message 28 of 244 (822032)
10-17-2017 9:14 PM

Reply to: Message 26 by Taq
10-17-2017 6:40 PM

Re: Another YAWN topic

When the orbit of Mercury violated Newton's Laws of Gravity we threw out Newton's Laws of Gravity, not the orbit of Mercury.

And when relativity explained the orbit of Mercury, that was validation that relativity was a better model than Newton's Law of Gravity.

We use the scientific method because it appears to work. If there were no constants then the scientific method wouldn't work and we wouldn't be able to make such stunningly accurate predictions as it relates to new experiments.

We also have evidence for constants, such as Uranium Halos and the Okla Natural Reactors producing the same by-products as man-made reactors, and in the observed radioactive decay of isotopes in the light from supernova's like 1987a.

If the laws of physics have changed then it is most likely that this occurred early in the life of the universe and that they have since decayed rapidly over time to the constants we see and observe.

Enjoy

Edited by RAZD, : .

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
	Message 26 by Taq, posted 10-17-2017 6:40 PM		Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 31 by Taq, posted 10-18-2017 5:37 PM		RAZD has seen this message but not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

2 online now:	PaulK, Percy (Admin)
Newest Member:	Cifa.ac
Post Volume:	Total: 920,099 Year: 421/6,935 Month: 421/275 Week: 138/159 Day: 1/15 Hour: 0/0