"The Flood" deposits as a sea transgressive/regressive sequence ("Walther's Law")

In defense of Faith, she is quite serious about her beliefs and does not see them as magic.
I have one question for both of you though. Can we agree that Creation Science starts with a conclusion whereas Science as taught traditionally starts with a Premise? Is this one of the basic differences?

I'll play Devils Advocate. The YEC position(starting with a conclusion) is that the great flood happened(1) and that when the fountains of the deep opened, they deposited the sediments onto the continents.
Like this:
Animation of Great Flood
Personally, I don't believe it but won't dismiss it except to agree that IF this happened, God deliberately hid the evidence from skeptics...only believers in Biblical Literalism would ever consider the flood as truth.

No, this topic is informative and educational. My only advice would be to slow down and not overwhelm any readers. Faith has apparently stopped posting for awhile and without her here you have nobody to refute...keep the explanations brief and concise. (my 2 cents)

Were I a Theologian representing Gods Word, even if I knew that it was 100% true, I would be doing a great disservice by avoiding using that as my final argument on any given scientific matter. Faith, if you disagree with the conclusions of the science, you have to explain why. You can't simply say that you disagree. If you feel that God is giving you wisdom as He gave the Prophets, say so. If you feel that people would see the truth if they only accepted Gods Word, say so. By ignoring all but 35 of 111 replies in this thread, 33 out of 64 in your own thread in Faith & Belief, and all but 168 of 399 in the evidence for the flood thread, you are not representing Jesus Christ honestly. I'm not pointing fingers---I have my sins and human frailties too..but this needs to be addressed in a discussion forum out of respect for all members.