What is Creationism?

Creationism is an attempt to make a theistic faith based belief look like science in order to gain wider acceptance.Creationism is the belief that God created the universe through some untestable, undetectable, and unfalsifiable process that apparently looks exactly like natural processes, but isn't.

And yet no such research is ever presented by creationists. Creationists still don't have any genetic or morphological tests or predictions outlining which species belong to which kind, or an explanation as to why separated kinds fall into a nested hierarchy. And yet they still can't provide evidence for a world wide flood layer.

Any faith based belief that requires supernatural magic would fall into the category of creationism.

That would certainly fit under the title of creationism because it has supernatural magic producing genes.

Your consistent refusal to address the evidence given demonstrates that you don't want to be convinced.

So do you not know you are spreading lies, or do you know they are lies and spread them anyway?

The problem is that it is just a religious belief and has no scientific relevance. Creationists can't measure, define, or demonstrate what information is with respect to genetics. It is just a throw away term to give the impression that they have an answer when in fact they have none.

The fact that you call them hybrids indicates that they are different species. Otherwise, you would just say that they are part of the population.You can't get hybrids without speciation.As to created kinds, it is a meaningless term because it can mean whatever you want it to mean. There are no objective criteria for determining which species belong to which kind. Even more, why can't two species share a common ancestor and be incapable of producing offspring? Creationists never explain that either.Let's take apes as our example. Are chimps, gorillas, and orangutans in the same kind? Is the genetic distance between these species indicative of the genetic differences we should see between species of the same created kind?

What we expect is a reason to trust the questions we do answer. Just believing really, really hard that something is true is not a reliable way to answer questions. Reality does not suddenly change because we decide it should be a certain way.

Why stop there?Cats, dogs, seals, and bears (to name a few) are part of the Carnivora kind. We are also part of the mammal kind with other mammal species. There is also the amniote, vertebrate, and eukaryote kinds. The Species Problem is a human problem. There is no law in nature that says species must fit into black and white categories because humans want them to. The Species Problem is simply human bias.If evolution is true then we should have the "Species Problem". Complete speciation doesn't occur in a single generation with evolution, so there should be a period of time where separate populations should still be able to produce fertile offspring. The second sentence contradicts the first sentence.If the links in that chain of hybridization are lost to extinction then you would have two separate kinds as determined by hybridization.Added in edit:I would also be curious to an answer to this question. Would you consider the genetic differences between species in the "cat kind" to be a good measure for what constitutes a kind? Given your inability to define what a kind is, how could you know which species belong to which kinds?Edited by Taq, : No reason given.