Evolution is a racist doctrine

If your graph or graphs show a flow chart, then do post the sequence.Do you not know how to read and retype the ancestral lineage of humans backwards.Why the evasive tactics. Iyts obvious you dont know ?Just admit it, its the only way to make progress ? Honesty can lead you to discovery..Denial only leads to mindless more denials.Who was our ancestors, who were the ancestors of primates...Why the fear and evasion.

Raz says through his posted graph that humans came from
( EvC Forum: Information... Message 328 )Humans came from Homininae, which came from Hominidae which evolved from Hominoidae which evolved from Hominoidea....I win, evolutionist is such a lie and so bogus, to be almsot laughable if it wasnt taken so seriously by the evolutionists.Its just semantics brethren and non brethren, just word manipulation and spelling...Read it again and marvel, that evolutionists actually believe our ancestors followed this spelling lineage......Humans ancestor was Homininae, which came from Hominidae which evolved from Hominoidae which evolved from Hominoidea....More concisely put in a flow chart for clarityHuman-Homininae-Hominidae-Hominoidae-Hominoidea....There it is BREAKING NEWS, we humans evolved from Hominoidea's 20 million years ago..... our ancestors are hominoidea's..I say our ancestors were humans, the same as us.Evolutionists say different, you choose your ancestor, and see if spelling is the defining factor or whether truth and science and common sense prevails.

You utter ignorant fool. You are still a Hominoidea whether you wish to admit it or not.You are as ignorant about science as you are about the Bible and Christianity it seems.

You've posted exactly the same thing on four threads (so far anyway), which is spamming and a troll trait.Which thread do you want the answer on:This one (Evolution is a racist doctrine Message 347)
or
A good summary of so called human evolution. Message 127
or
The story of Bones and Dogs and Humans Message 8
or
Debunking the Evolutionary God of 'Selection' Message 228or do you want me to pick?Inquiring minds want to know.EnjoyUpdate - See A good summary of so called human evolution. Message 131 for replyEdited by RAZD, : abeEdited by RAZD, : updated

If this is the ignorance one has to adopt in order to be a Christian, is it any wonder why so many people don't become Christians?When Christians distort, misrepresent, and lie about facts, is it any wonder why so many people don't believe them when they talk about the Bible?Edited by Taq, : No reason given.

Sure, it's a diagram of classification; but phylogenetic classification. The diagram is a phylogram, a family tree, whatever you want to call it. The proposed classification in the tree ('Sundatheria') is a proposed clade. I'm not sure if you're misinterpreting the picture or if I'm misunderstanding what you're trying to say.With regards to DavidJay, we can agree on 'challenging to interpret'.

Maybe I can state it another way. Here's the diagram: Davidjay interpreted it as saying that primates are descended from Euarchonta, rather than that they're a member of Euarchonta. Then, not understanding that Scandentia, shown in the diagram as also members of Euarchonta, are tree shrews he read that tree shrews are part of Euarchonta and concluded that primates are descended from tree shrews. That's my interpretation of how Davidjay reached his conclusions.If I understand what you mean when you explain that it's a diagram of "phylogenetic classification", it says our ancestor species were also members of Euarchonta.--Percy

I think it's simpler than that.I think Davidjay simply decided to read it from top to bottom and ignore east to west. But that may be being overly generous.

As mentioned, evolution does not know who our ancestors were, or are too embarassed to say so.Their graphs from their artists, and their linguistic efforts from their paid professors, show that its just semantics... they change a letter here or there and try to group animals or kinds or species or breeds into a confusing mess of names. These clades, or groupings or semantic titles then supposedly show our ancestors.So I repeat, who are our ancestors.Have a brave evolutionists say or write what the FLOW CHART of our ancestry came from.Flow chart, not semantic names of groupings...a flow chart.Evolution preaches one kind evolved into another kind, so from which kind did we evolve from.... go back as far as you can ... especially to one celled organisms if possible and state your flow chart.I know its embarassing, but be honest and do it...OK OK, Ill start and answer from a creationists perspective, logical, rational, scientific and concise.We came from other humans, the same all the way back to the starting couple.Now your turn evolutionists and athiests, whats your flow chart ?.Gotcha again.Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.

We already did just that. You continue to ignore it. Here is another one:

As mentioned many times, where did primates come from. Who were their ancestors all the way back to single cells or whatever you evolutionists deem strated life.Your chart, back millions or billions of years is still amongst primates, as they are close enough in looks for you to pretend to extrapolate for the undiscerning that humans came from monkeys, and chimps.If you note, the question is where did primates come from..what is their ancestry ?But if you like can you answer this simple evolution question, that evolutionists seem to disagree on.. HEREINDid one species change into another species...I thought evolution teaches this, even as you show your supposed flow chart of primates...Does one species turn into a new and different species or KIND ?Thanks very much if you can answer this very easy question... Much appreciated

As mentioned many times, how is evolution racist?

Please study and read all the original posts of mine........ and then answer the question.Did one species evolve and create a new species and KIND.In the past, it appears that evolutionists say there has been no branching and no new species, and yet you evolutionists come up with artists depictions of branching, as if chimps or monkeys produced mankind.Do state whether evolution produces new kinds ?

The topic is your assertion that "Evolution is a racist doctrine" and we are will over 300 posts but you have not yet presented any support for your absurd assertions.Address the topic please!

I did. Nowhere in those posts does it explain how evolution is racist.So why do you claim that evolution is racist? What is your reasoning?