|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 49 (9229 total) |
| |
USA Pharma Store | |
Total: 921,490 Year: 1,812/6,935 Month: 242/333 Week: 3/79 Day: 2/1 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2717 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Evolution is a racist doctrine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay ![]() Suspended Member (Idle past 2717 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
4.Points should be supported with evidence and reasoned argumentation. Address rebuttals through the introduction of additional evidence or by enlarging upon the argument. Do not repeat previous points without further elaboration. Avoid bare assertions.
I win, Jar and almost all evolutionists refuse to answer questions, and refuse to participate in the topic, that evolution is a racist doctrine. We can put this proven thread in Summation mode even though I am not allowed to start any new victorious provable threads. SUMMATION MODE PLEASE.Evolutyionists are used to forcing their theory on students and scientists. They are not used to answering any questions on this theory, because it is their religion. And as a religion it must be accepted by faith.... It is not science and it is not logical or rational and has no facts behind it. Evolution is a con and a LIE. A big one, but because it is forced on the gullible and on students, they must accept it. This their modus operandi...and so when faced with sane biological opposition, they can only be subjective rather than objective.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2494 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
I win, Jar and almost all evolutionists refuse to answer questions, and refuse to participate in the topic, that evolution is a racist doctrine. We have refuted your nonsense, and shown your preaching to be false. You lose. Again.Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge. Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein In the name of diversity, college student demands to be kept in ignorance of the culture that made diversity a value--StultisTheFool It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers If I am entitled to something, someone else is obliged to pay--Jerry Pournelle If a religion's teachings are true, then it should have nothing to fear from science...--dwise1 "Multiculturalism" demands that the US be tolerant of everything except its own past, culture, traditions, and identity. Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other points of view--William F. Buckley Jr.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10450 Joined: Member Rating: 6.5
|
Davidjay writes: Percy oversimplified my case and my victorious debate, as I explained thoroughly why evolution is a branching, and then was amazed that evolutionists denied their own branching theory.I was amazed they thought treeshrews were our ancestors, and that bats are our cousins or brotherrs on their evolutionary tree which they say is science and fact... and not just an artists depiction. They hate it when I reinforce my claim and further prove my claim and truth. Its obvious and common sense as evolution is the cornerstone philosphu of evolution. They answer few questions except that they think we came from tree shrews, and then start denying even that. Evolutionists are elusive and non committal except among their own congregation talking about their theory in support of other theories for the THEORY of Evolution. Otherwise they arswer no questions posed to them and get very angry and out of control as illustrated HEREIN. Heres that hyper for you.... because some evolutionists cant read it... and its about how evolutionists try to use the old old trick of asking but never answering anythking themselves.
We are still waiting for you to explain why evolution is racist.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 227 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Davidjay writes: I win, Jar and almost all evolutionists refuse to answer questions, and refuse to participate in the topic, that evolution is a racist doctrine. And there you go lying yet again. This happens to be a topic YOU started. You asserted that " Evolution is a racist doctrine " yet you have provided absolutely NO support for that utterly stupid assertion while 28 people have responded to you showing why your assertion is simply false, ignorant and sophomoric. You do understand David that folk can actually read the thread and see that you once again utterly failed to support or even discuss your own topic? What a loser!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chiroptera Inactive Member
|
SUMMATION MODE PLEASE. That actually might be a good idea.Freedom is merely privilege extended, unless enjoyed by one and all. — Billy Bragg
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member (Idle past 93 days) Posts: 4597 From: Oregon, USA Joined:
|
Davidjay writes: They hate it when I reinforce my claim and further prove my claim and truth. Except you have never reinforced your claim. Stating your false claim over and over and over does nothing to strengthen it. It just shows us that you really have nothing to support your claim.
Davidjay writes: Its obvious and common sense as evolution is the cornerstone philosphu of evolution. Read this out loud to yourself a couple times. Notice the problem? What is obvious and common sense is that you do not know how to express anything obvious or common sense.
Davidjay writes: evolution is the cornerstone philosphu of evolution. Really, THIS is common sense?
Ignorance and stupidity is the cornerstone of Davidjay's argument. You say "evolution is a racist doctrine" and we say "how, show us?" and you say a whole bunch of gibberish and then "evolution is a racist doctrine" and we disagree and say"how, show us?" See the problem yet? So far all we have from you is "blah blah jesus blah blah". For a preacher, you are the worst communicator I have ever seen. Oh yeah, we win you lose! Loser! Edited by Tanypteryx, : No reason given.What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Admin Director Posts: 13151 From: EvC Forum Joined:
|
Davidjay writes: I was amazed they thought treeshrews were our ancestors,...... They answer few questions except that they think we came from tree shrews,... No one said we came from tree shrews. I'm going to begin suspending you for 24 hours each time you make this statement, or any statement clearly at odds with what people have said.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
Percy oversimplified my case and my victorious debate Now that you've won, can we end this? Summation mode. Please. Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend. Thomas Jefferson Seems to me if its clear that certain things that require ancient dates couldn't possibly be true, we are on our way to throwing out all those ancient dates on the basis of the actual evidence. -- Faith Some of us are worried about just how much damage he will do in his last couple of weeks as president, to make it easier for the NY Times and Washington post to try to destroy Trump's presidency. -- marc9000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay ![]() Suspended Member (Idle past 2717 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Evolutionists dont know where we came from, so evade the question....and use semantics to cover up their huge gaps in their theory.
Their trees are artists conceptions and do NOT show what evolved from what, but rather groups which should have existed and possibly have parented other groups. Its full of MISSING LINKS and their tree branching is just a classification system of maube might have, could have been ancestors, that might have could be or might be found, but sadly all went extionct or were just imaginations of an evolutionists mind. This is why they debate classifications endlessly among themselves...why because they have no proofs, no cause and effect, no parentage lineage.Its just semantics as mentioned..... well call this branch para-primates, because there is no animal called paraprimates, its just a label, a make-believe group of animals that should have been around to form future primates. First they say primates came from bats, then tree shrewsEvolutyionists are used to forcing their theory on students and scientists. They are not used to answering any questions on this theory, because it is their religion. And as a religion it must be accepted by faith.... It is not science and it is not logical or rational and has no facts behind it. Evolution is a con and a LIE. A big one, but because it is forced on the gullible and on students, they must accept it. This their modus operandi...and so when faced with sane biological opposition, they can only be subjective rather than objective.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9699 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 6.2
|
Davidjay writes: First they say primates came from bats, then tree shrews You realise that you're heading for a ban don't you? What kind idiot does the same idiotic thing twice knowing the consequencies? A big one I guess.Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. "Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved." - Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1793 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
First they say primates came from bats, then tree shrews Intentionally repeating a comment that has been shown to be a false portrayal of what people have said is a lie.
Their trees are artists conceptions and do NOT show what evolved from what, but rather groups which should have existed and possibly have parented other groups. Its full of MISSING LINKS and their tree branching is just a classification system of maube might have, could have been ancestors, that might have could be or might be found, but sadly all went extionct or were just imaginations of an evolutionists mind. This is why they debate classifications endlessly among themselves...why because they have no proofs, no cause and effect, no parentage lineage. Says the person ignorant of genetics and morphology. Amusingly what the discussion involves is decent from a common ancestor, just as creationists claim all life descended from original kinds. They are scared to actually look at what those original kinds look like in the fossil and genetic records, scared to follow their belief. Creationists should welcome the effort scientists put into developing clades of descent, because that is exactly how descent from original kinds would occur, but they are scared that the evidence will not validate their beliefs, so they mock and chide and dissemble and lie.
Its just semantics as mentioned..... well call this branch para-primates, because there is no animal called paraprimates, its just a label, a make-believe group of animals that should have been around to form future primates. Please provide the names and descriptions for all the purported original kinds, and then show how species alive today descended from those original kinds. Davidjay never provides real answers to questions posed to him, just another non-sequitur diversion. You can check this out by looking at the index for each thread, a tool that also shows his frequent claim of never being answered to be another falsehood. by our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay ![]() Suspended Member (Idle past 2717 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Where did humans come from Raz ?
Being told to "Fuck you I can fucking write whatever I want" by CatsEye to me is against the rules of civil debate, ) at EvC Forum: Isaiah 53 speaks about ISRAEL, and not about the messiah. ...message 145 )but this board says otherewise and allows evolutionists do write such vulgar comments without punishment. Evolutionists are used to forcing their theory on students and scientists. They are not used to answering any questions on this theory, because it is their religion. And as a religion it must be accepted by faith.... It is not science and it is not logical or rational and has no facts behind it. Evolution is a con and a LIE. A big one, but because it is forced on the gullible and on students, they must accept it. This their modus operandi...and so when faced with sane biological opposition, they can only be subjective rather than objective.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1793 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined:
|
Where did humans come from Raz ? The earliest Homo sapiens fossils found to date are from Ethiopia from about 200,000 years ago. Technically "Humans" (genus Homo) evolved from Australopithicines, an extinct type of ape very similar to the first species of the Homo clade (ergaster and habilis).
quote: Our ancestor apes would have evolved from common ancestor population of ancient apes that we share with chimps, an ancestor ape, probably similar to Ardipithicus ramidus. Enjoyby our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Admin Director Posts: 13151 From: EvC Forum Joined:
|
Davidjay writes: First they say primates came from bats, then tree shrews No one said primates came from bats or tree shrews. As I said when I suspended you previously, I will suspend you each time you make significant misstatements of what people have said. This time I'm suspending you for 48 hours.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diomedes Member Posts: 1000 From: Central Florida, USA Joined:
|
First they say primates came from bats, then tree shrews Well, many have already corrected you that this was never stated. And you have been banned twice for repeating it. But when (if) you return, please view the following graphic:
Do you see the branches for humans? Do you also see the branches for bats? Do you see ANY line that shows humans deriving from bats? Of course you don't. Because you are simply a Christian Troll. And if you want to troll, that is your prerogative. But that will simply result in more suspensions.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025