|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2714 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Evolution is a racist doctrine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2862 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined:
|
Davidjay writes: In a world where nationalism and religion and color of skin are being used to separate people, I think it would be beneficial if we discussed how the theory of evolution is being used to promote such a division between people.For evolution teaches that a species or kind divides from its original species into a new viable species. Or in human terms .....a better species or kind of human... a superior human race. For although all wars are fought for economic reasons, the powers of individual countries try to sell their news wars, on the fact or propaganda that the other country is inferior or evil or is in danger of getting stronger than them etc. etc. The underlying rationale is that the local countries bloodlines or DNA or genes mutated in that countries borders, is somehow superior to those humans in another country. This they know is a forced doctrine in biology as taught in all the worldly universities, and fits in perfectly with their propaganda means of promoting their wars. Everyone wants to feel superior to others, its part of their self esteem, seemingly being BETTER than others. The leaders of these countries can feed this competitive waring motivation to their so called superior or chosen people... so they feel a need to go to war and sacrifice all for their small nationalistic patriotic country. Absolutely, David, you've hit the nail on the head. Before "The Origin of Species" was published in 1859, the world was peaceful and egalitarian, functioning on ideas like one person one vote democracy, socialism, human rights and the equality of all people under the law. Then, after this evil publication, the Europeans rapidly established a feudal system and the concept of aristocratic and royal bloodlines, so those who believed themselves of superior lines would marry amongst themselves, and treat others as their inferiors, and exercise their biological rights of Kingship and Lordship; and nations started to regard themselves as unequal, and the first wars began. The disease spread. For example, when the evil tract was translated into Hindi, the caste system was invented in India; a strict, unequal hierarchy based on the Darwinian concept of fitness and bloodlines. Then wars began on the subcontinent for the first time. All over the world hereditary Chiefdoms, Kingdoms and Empires sprang up for the first time, based on bloodlines, superiority and inferiority, concepts that had never existed before. Bloody struggles followed everywhere, as we see now in the Middle-East, where the Sunni Darwinians and Shia Darwinians slaughter each other in a struggle for dominance. Darwinian evil is truly abroad, and what can we do? Fortunately, there are people with great insight in this world, like you, dear David, so there is hope. For a start, I recommend that, like the Nazis, we should ban the evil book "Origin of Species". We must try to get back to the pre-Darwinian ideal of the eighteenth century and before. Bringing back the highly egalitarian African slave trade might be a next step toward ridding ourselves of this ugly modern racism and then we could go forward from there.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2862 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined:
|
Davidjay writes: Evolutionists think they come from monkeys and their grandparents are chimps, and their cousins are primates and their god is Evolution, I differ. But as a Christian, I must defend the right of you to have choice, and follow any heritage you choose. Please feel free to visit the zoos as much as you like to reconnect with your close relatives. Indeed, we could visit the zoos, and sooner or later we might observe a primate picking up its own excrement and slinging it wildly around, as caged primates are sometimes known to do. Alternatively, we could stay here on EvC, read your posts, and observe a different primate doing pretty much the same thing. Everywhere we look, we see evidence for common descent.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2862 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined: |
Davidjay writes: Chir, again trying to get away from the truth that evolution is a branching, that in and of itself means it is a racist doctrine, ... states a HUGE LIE"Humans have always been a single interbreeding population" Study this insanity, Chir trying to make an exception out of humans says, that humans inbreed only among themselves. An new breakthrough in evolutionary theory just compsed by Chir, to evade the guilt of racism. He says they have 'always been'...meaning from the Beginning humans were separated. Read his insanity again.... Your foolish theory doesnt allow you to make an EXCEPTION and articifically magically say that humans are an exception and that humans only are inbreed. Lets see evolutionists tried to say primates are our cousins and grandparents and ancestors, meaning apes and chimps... even though their theory calls this evolution and branching and evolving new species. They say the branch has always been there, no branch below ever branched with humans. All this to evade the guilt of having a racist doctrione as their cornerstone. I repeat evolutionists play semantic games and will LIE to defend their theory and illusion. I win agin, logic wins, consistency wins, evolutionary exceptions are ridiculous..... and DESPERATE to say the least, its a blatant L** I tried Google translate, but it just seemed confused by the above. Can anyone here translate this into English for the rest of us?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2862 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined: |
Taq writes: bluegenes writes: I tried Google translate, but it just seemed confused by the above. Can anyone here translate this into English for the rest of us? I think I can give it a try. Davidjay is racist. He thinks that anyone different from him is inferior to him...... Judging by that post, he'd be flattering himself if he considered himself superior to the proverbial monkey with a typewriter.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2862 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined: |
Davidjay writes: Evolutionary biology, or theoritical biologist or false scientists, That's a very multi-racial group of people you're trying to describe. It's a pity you didn't look at the diversity of names on all of those research papers that you've never read in the course of accumulating your complete lack of knowledge of the subject that you have chosen to enlighten the world about.
Davidjay writes: hate to consider the effects of their theories, and pretend that they are just researchers of luck and chance and that their theories have no effect ...... on anything or anybody. They say they make no judgments of the cause and effects of their dementias. Take any standard definition of biological evolutionary theory, David, and tell us which part of it you think is prescriptive, and why? If you can't find any part of the theory that is prescriptive, then could you explain why you started this thread and continue to appear to claim that it is prescriptive? If you don't think it's prescriptive, then what is it in a description of the living world as coming about due to descent with modification directed by natural selection that would lead people to racism? As all living groups of humans are, by definition, "fit" in biological terms (otherwise they wouldn't be here), what makes you conclude that different regional groups should be given different values according to evolutionary theory? Ignorance of the theory?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2862 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined:
|
We have the intermediate forms.
Evolution wins. Viscount "bluegenes" Dracula* *Head of international campaign against anti-atavistic racism
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2862 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined:
|
Davidjay writes: I win evolution is racist, and creates wierd monsters in the minds of evolutionists. You refer to my ancestors as "weird monsters" and "devils", then you accuse others of racism.
Count Batula
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2862 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined:
|
Davidjay writes: See, bluegenes, no evolutionist protested your posting your demonic transitional pic. They all seem content for you to dishonour this discussion board, by stooping so low, in your frustrations to try and win. Evolution does not teach morality and does not teach wisdom or manners.. it only teaches atheism and lack of morals and civility. Lets see if evolutionists will back you up in your demonic transitional pic or if they will have some class and bring honor to the discussion board. Usually they just run and hide, and over look, anything done by their own. "Better half-bat than completely batty" my old Grandma used say, whispering between her fangs.
Count Batula Chairman: Campaign to end anti-atavistic racism Fledermaus Castle, Carpathia.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2862 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined:
|
Davidbat writes: Agreed, the demonic transition pic was not done in class or in the spirit of honest debate. How would you know what that is?
Davidjay writes: First of all, I would hope ALL of us deem racism as negative. You are a supporter and promoter of the Old Testament, which is a racist, pro-genocide tract. You are anti- Midianite.
Davidjay writes: Most moral people do, but that is our supposed value judgment HERE and on which I have proceeded further from. Racism as negative and against our human values of cooperation and even survival.... is our GIVEN Moses, your lawgiver, would not agree.
quote: Just like the Islamic State people recently.
Davidjay writes: Right ? Or do some evolutionists disagree with this statment against racism. I think not, so our judgment or moral I assume is that ALL of us are against racism ? Unless someone steps out of the shadows and posts their agreement with racism. I think you should step out of the shadows, David, and admit that this thread has been a low attempt by you to conceal your own racism by accusing others. You are also clearly anti-bat.
Count Batula
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025