Summations Only

The only person on these boards who I suspect us able to understand the sort of math you'd need to understand, in order to discuss how physical laws came about, is Son Goku. You need to be able to understand the sort of maths and physics that the world's best scientific minds are currently wrestling with.And that counts me out. Just as it counts you out David - because it involves rather more than addition (assuming one is capable of actually adding up properly) and numerology. I am guessing that you're unable to do multi dimensional geometry ?

This is directly on topic. YOU started the topic and so far the only "GIVEN" is that you don't know what you are talking about. You cannot name any of the "Laws of the Universe", let alone tell us how many there are or what they mean. See, you can't get even the simplest things correct.There was no "Magic" involved in the Big Bang and there was NO EXPLOSION.....spacetime is expanding not exploding.And you have been told over and over and over and over that the Universe is billions of years old not trillions.If you want to discuss things with people who know how science works you shouldn't try to convince them that they believe things that they do not.So far you have convinced us that you have no clue what you are talking about.

Aha... a new semantic phrase brought to you by evolutionists.Space time is expanding not exploding... life was created by a slow expansion as another evolutionist put in.Its not an explosion, the elements or non molecules just nicely re-arranged as the expansion happened and just slowly drifted to our little part of the Universe, where they all just rearranged themselves into our balanced and harmonic world just by slow lucky chance and a slow expansion, that was nicely organized and not a big bang but just a slow moving bang expansion.And I thought I heard every excuse under the Sun from evolutionists and now they come up with this, because they realise a Big Bang sounds to much like an explosion. And no one could ever believe such a ridiculous explosion could create life and help evolve life, so they slowed it all down to a slow slow expansion.I nominate this evolutionary double speak phrase as the JOKE OF THE DAYEdited by Davidjay, : No reason given.

David, your post is just another of your lies. No one but you has suggested life was created by a slow expansion and your assertion that you are simply quoting what someone esle said is just another of your continuing lies.

Chir stated it, I think Percy stated it, so evolutionists must now be using it everywhere to get away from their Big Bang Theory.But if you like you can call them liars for stating such ridiculous double speak.And do repost properly, as I didn;t state it, but was using their written words, as proof of their mistakes and new theories on old theories, on new explosions to cover up for old explosions.

Sorry but no one but you said life resulted from a slow expansion.You really can't stop lying in every single post, can you?

Summation..Creationism wins again, I win againLaws have been proven to be created, and have been HERE since the Beginning as even the evolutionists admit.No one has suggested that laws have evolved, no conditions or environments have created any new laws and no one can expect any laws to develop or evolve.The harmony of all laws was done simultaneously in the BEGINNING at Creation, at Genesis.No Laws happened by evolutionary luck or chance.Evolution once again fails.Name calling, and labeling doesnt negate the truth that laws were created and have not evolved.

Natural Laws, like morality are simply human creations that describe a property of matter. While the properties of matter are inherent in the matter itself, the laws that describe those properties are the creations of humans and evolve as man develops more precise measurements and additional data. With greater precision and more data laws evolve. Often older laws continue to be used despite having evolved into newer laws as long as the older laws explain what is observed in sufficient detail for a given project.