The TRVE history of the Flood...

I was going along with your scenario just to be pleasant, but by now I've lost all interest, sorry. In reality it's obvious that nothing could have lived where the sediments were deposited over thousands of square miles that became the strata in the Geological Column. Nothing could have been living already from the previous deposition, and nothing could have evolved from anything previous for that reason and even if something did live it would have been buried by the next deposit. Thinkity thinking should get all that across.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Buried very very deep.

As usual changing the subject is the method of my opponents. Yes it's a wild guess, off the cuff. I've argued for the Flood sufficiently already, the rest will eventually fall in place. We've got a stack of flat sedimentary rocks originally about three miles deep, clearly deposited in water as individual layers and not accumulated over time, many covering thousands of square miles of flat flat flat flattity flatness with nary a sign of former surface life, containing all the dead things that the Flood was supposed to kill.We know there was a Flood. We know roughly when it occurred. We know its purpose was to kill all things that lived on the land except the few preserved on a large boat. All the evidence shows exactly that.Imputing millions of years of living things to a rock is nonsensical. There really is no need to consider other factors. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Yes, and I do apologize to Stile. I lost track of that discussion and I'm sorry I left him in the lurch. But I'm just not up to continuing it right now. Also he was making the case for slow accumulation of sediments (and doing a pretty good job of it IMO), but the actual appearance of the actual strata is of continuous deposition by water: flat surfaces, many with very tight contacts that wouldn't have occurred if uppermost on the surface for millions of years, even under water, rapid compaction by weight accumulated above too, which in Stile's scenario occurred after way too much time to be convincing. Etc.

Either you are wrong or the God who made it all is wrong. No contest RAZD. He even kindly gave us a written history so that we wouldn't have to depend on our fallen minds as you all do, stumbling around in the dark as you do. Wisdom would take Him at His word. As scripture says, "Let every man be a liar, but God be true."Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Rather you pick the conjob of your own fallen intellect over the revelation of the God who made it all.

All the strata were originally laid down flat. Many were distorted afterward by tectonic forces that bent and twisted them -- all in blocks that show it occurred after they were all laid down. Sorry, the Flood is the best explanation for it all no matter what delusions have captured your imagination.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

All I need is the Bible for the timing. God's word you know. I give other kinds of evidence where there is no Biblical information.The only places there seem to be strata laid down after tectonic disturbance are angular unconformities which I've explained as occurring after those strata were laid down.

The last dozen or so posts I've put up on this thread are all the evidence needed for the Flood and against the Geo Time Scale. Sorry, but you and your EvC army of evos are just blowing smoke.

Ha ha. The case has been made. Sorry.

It's been discussed to death over the last few years. You lost.

Convincing the brainwashed isn't the right criterion. The case has been made logically though denied by the local gang of evos. Sorry.

I've given all the evidence needed to prove the Flood. Sorry.

Nothing dishonest about anything I said. I've made the case so there is no need to address all the other stuff. That's perfectly legitimate.

Ya know what? At this point that is quite true. I've had more than enough of the EvC brand of "discussion." I've made my point, I proved it, that's all there is to say.