So much wrong in your second paragraph.
Porkncheese writes:
Accepting religion growing up I then started to hear and learn the opinion of others. By the age of 16 I had rejected religion and just went along with evolution, big bang, all that.
False dichotomy. The mainstream Christian Churches accept evolution the BB theory and all that. To them it's not a situation of either/or, but both.
Porkncheese writes:
I didn't give it much thought again until I was in my 30's when I started to hear and learn the opinions of others.
Opinions are like anuses, everyone's got one.
Porkncheese writes:
And after watching, listening and reading arguments for and against I'm not at all convinced that the biological theory of evolution is 100% fact.
Who's ever said that the biological theory is fact? The fact is that organisms have changed over time. The theory of evolution explains how. The theory explains mechanisms involved.
Porkncheese writes:
Much of the so called supporting evidence is inconclusive or subject to various assumptions.
Actually, the supporting evidence is how the specialists came to the conclusions they have.
And, oh, be very weary when creationists talk about "assumptions". Scientists have evidence for their assumptions.